| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
What the GOP needs: Visionary Leaders
Today the congressional caucus of the GOP unveiled their “bold new economic plan” for stealing some of the wind from the democratic sails as we move forward into preparations for the general election. These plans included agressive proposals for finally pushing forward with oil and gas exploration and extraction, and a move towards long overdue tax reform.
“To protect consumers, the House GOP plan would harness new technologies and unlock America’s energy resources in the Alaskan coastal plain, deep ocean energy zones, and elsewhere to lower gas prices, create jobs, and break America’s dependence on foreign sources of energy. To protect taxpayers from pork-barreling politicians and wasteful Washington spending, our plan would establish an immediate earmark moratorium and prohibit federal spending from growing faster than the overall economy. And to protect American families and small businesses, the Republican blueprint would stop the Democrats’ largest tax hike in history, eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax, and give taxpayers the option of paying a flat tax and filing their taxes on a single page.”
http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=93622
After taking a moment to give our people a mental clap on the back, frustration and to some extent despair reared it’s ugly head in my heart.
Our radical new plan, is in effect a watered down version of some of the platform issues that made Mike Huckabee so attractive to his supporters. The same Huckabee vision that was shot down by party elites as one that was not well thought out, or practically impossible to accomplish.
When I thought further of the tumultuous ride we have all been on in this econonomy and society in general these last crazy months of the political silly season, I found more and more examples of Huckabee’s foresight on issues that later came to be the talk of the day.
Let’s start with the economy. During one of the early debates, Huckabee was the only GOP candidate to answer a question about the state of the economy with a ‘non party line,’ but truthful answer. For the working class American, the economy was not doing very well at all; and he was right. Within a month of that debate, the sqeeze that the working class was feeling, had crept into the middle class sensibility, and the stock market was on the fritz. Now the struggling economy is “issue number one”.
On the war on terror, Huckabee wrote a comprehensive analysis of current strategy in the middle east, and proposed that we needed to be focusing more on Pakistan and holding them more accountable for helping us in the GWOT, given the amount of resources we are pouring into their coffers. He was ridiculed for suggesting that the Bush administration had a ‘bunker mentality’ to the war, and his position on Pakistan was laughed out of town. A few weeks later, Bhutto was assasinated, democracy took a few steps backward in Pakistan, and an environment of political unrest increased the chances that Pakistan would fall into the hands of the extremists in its midst. Who’s laughing now?
Anybody who ever watched a republican debate was sure to hear the mantra from Huckabee, ‘We need to be able to feed ourselves, fuel ourselves, and defend ourselves,” if we are to stay free.
He suggested, again to ridicule, that America needed to start exploring all options, alternative and fossil, to ensure our energy independence within ten years. He even went so far as to draw paralells with the pace of the progress that was made by Kennedy in the space race. He did not talk about long term planning, he talked about doing it NOW, and agressively. Now we are paying over four dollars a gallon for gas, and everybody wants to ‘Drill now” with the ultimate effect of possibly being energy independent within the decade.
Huckabee talked about the importance of being able to feed ourselves, and implementing policies that would insure that our food supply did not have to come from external sources. This may seem to be common sense, but he was the ONLY candidate, on either side of the isle to talk openly about food sustainability on the campaign trail. Now, the world is in the middle of a food crisis. Rice and flour are being rationed at Wal-Mart and Cost-Co. Food prices are going up in part because of poor policy implemented regarding biofuel mandates, and there are riots in the streets in developed and third world countries alike. why was Huckabee the only one with the vision to adress this critical subject as part of his policy platform?
Huckabee also talked about the danger inherant in outsourcing our self defense. Again, this was not part of ANY other candidates talking points on the stump. Along comes the scandal of the outsourcing of our fuel tanker pentagon contract to a European based company. Now ‘Outsourcing our defense’ is the latest buzzword on the talk circuit.
Huckabee was howled out of town for daring to suggest that our Tax system needs a massive overhaul. He was considered naieve for adopting a platform issue in the Fair Tax that ‘could never be passed.’ Well somebody needs to do something!! Tax reform MUST be on the agenda of one party or the other, and whoever latches on to it first will have a winning platform for years to come. It looks like the GOP is taking a step in the right direction with the disclosures in today’s statement.
Huckabee was the only GOP candidate to call the stimulus package the farce that it is, pointing out that it only stimulates the economies of the very countries with whom we have a terrible trade deficit imbalance. Many lauded, and some decried his suggestion that working on restoring our infrastructure would stimulate our local economies, while providing jobs and strengthening the foundations that ensure our transportation veins remain open for commerce. The tragedy of the bridge collapse in Minneapolis. subsequently made the subject of our rotting infrastructure take center stage for weeks on end. Now many in congress on the left and the right are advocating for infrastructure development in their home states as a means of stimulating economic growth.
When all is said and done, time and time again, the wisdom and foresight that Huckabee has demonstrated in sensing what issues need to be highlighted and adressed is nothing short of astonishing. It shouldn’t be, he has governed for ten and a half years successfully, even if his detractors prefer the spin that he is a preacher on a political holiday.
It is high time that this man get some of the respect that he deserves for being a brilliant and visionary politician. If you’re going to adopt and implement his ideas, at least have the courage to admit that he’s not the ‘hick, knuckledragging, snake oil salesman, Huckabilly’ that so many of you, liberal and conservative alike, have deemed him to be.
America may never know the gem it lost by not having the courage to believe that somone so unorthodox, and yet so intimately connected with her heart, could make it all the way to the oval office. She may yet be lucky enough to benifit from his vision, if John McCain finds the courage in his heart to do the hard thing and offer him the veep spot.
I can only hope.
- Rensen's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Huckabee's problem
His problem for me was his record as Arkansas governor. Tax hikes then but pushing the Fair Tax now? He increased spending over 65% from 1996-2004, but became a fiscal hawk in 2008? Sorry, but I wasn't buying what Huckabee was selling.
Insufficient data.
He increased spending over 65% from 1996-2004
Is that good, bad, or indifferent? I don't know the figures for other states but I'd be very surprised if a 65% increase in those eight years was not normal.
Let's be honest here. If Huckabee was voicing the sort of left-wing clap-trap that McCain has been coming out with, he'd be hung in effigy. Issues are not the issue, even for the sort of people who frequent political blogs. Image is everything, and Huckabees image is unpopular.
Limited government
As a limited government conservative I think government has been spending too much money for too long. I'm pretty sure an 8+% average yearly increase topped inflation.
Fair or not, two words define Huck in much of the country
"Baptist preacher".
In the South, that helps us. But if we can;t win those states over Obama, well, let's party like its 2016
In the Blue states, and many Purple states, this is a message to many erstwhile Republicans they may not want to receive. Flipping NH or PA would be nice this cycle, ya think?
No it doesn't
Because The Southern Baptist Convention only Follows the Huckabee style in Arkansas and Georgia
Compare AR to other states in the same timeframe
Bob Novak in an article excoriated Huckabee for a "47 percent increase in state tax burden." But during Huckabee's years in office, total state tax burden — all 50 states combined — rose by twice as much: 98 percent, increasing from $743 billion in 1993 to $1.47 trillion in 2005.
In Arkansas, the income tax when he took office was 1 percent for the poorest taxpayers and 7 percent for the richest, exactly where it stood when he left the statehouse 11 years later. But, in the interim, he doubled the standard deduction and the child care credit, repealed capital gains taxes for home sales, lowered the capital gains rate, expanded the homestead exemption, and set up tax-free savings accounts for medical care and college tuition.
http://www.newsmax.com/morris/conservative_huckabee/2007/11/28/52780.html
He left with a budget surplus of 800 million so he couldn't have grown spend much more than the tax burden increased and if there was more money to spend it was because the economy did well during those years in Arkansas.
Also remember that the legislature sets the budget at Huckabee has no veto power because you only need a 50%+1 vote to over ride a Govs veto in that state and Dems had over 80% of the legislature.
Does Huckabee really "get no respect"?
I don't recall him as being the Rodney Dangerfield of the GOP. In fact, I thought he handled himself very well during the debates, whereas Fred only seemed to wake up once near the end. Compared to the ridicule that Ron Paul received, Huck came off smartly.
Now this is not to say for a moment that he doesn't "fit in" to the GOP's obviously very high standards for membership into the "in crowd". Alas, neither do most of the rest of us. I certainly don't. Uh...I think that speaks very highly for both me 'n Mike. And don't even get me started on Janet Huckabee. That woman totally kicks ass - doing her own laundry in New Hampshire and hunting and roping hay bales and staying at Hooters Hotel in Vegas! If she went over to Afghanistan instead of Laura Bush, Bin Laden would be so a-skeered o' that lil' gal that he'd a just come right on out with his hands up.
I'd say the fact that some of his campaign ideas are being recycled is the sincerest form of flattery. I also think it's kind of cool how ferociously loyal his voters are. I think he stayed in just long enough to prove his value to the party but not too long to piss everyone in the higher echelon off. And a lot of people liked him outside of the Bible Belt. Heck, even my husband in going-to-Hell California liked him, and he's an atheist. He could have lived without some of the churchy stuff, though.
The thing I liked the best about him was the fact that he actually gave some thought to repairing the old, crappy infrastructure. It's very pro-business to keep the roads and power grids in good repair. It's also very pro-national security and pro-community.
But best of all, he had Chuck Norris. I've heard that he destroyed the Periodic Table because he only recognizes the element of Surprise.
Keep comin' back, Rensen. Good to see ya again.
Deleted
by the Department of Redundancy Department
Closet respect...
Thanks Rebel,
I've been around, just hadn't seen or heard anything provocative enough to blog about for a few days.
I think that Mike gets a lot of respect from the 'man on the street', and some in the faith and minority communities. But to be honest, the only person in office, or in the echelons of the GOP that has ever openly praised Mike for his skills as a politician was John McCain, who told reporters that Mike was a role model to him.
I think that he's scary to the elites and the far right.. if anything he's TOO rooted in the people to play by party rules all the time. And there is nothing the establishment fears more than someone in power who is NOT beholden to them. I think they see him as a 'loose cannon' and fear not being able to control him if he gets into the WH.
I don't think you can really respect someone you fear.
Then why is it
Except for Arkansas and Iowa Mike Huckabee never got the majority of the Evangelical vote. And in the case of Arkansas he only got the largest plurality.
it might be that his roots with social conservatives aren't as deep as the media wants you to think
Mike's base was never all evangelical!!
Finally someone gets it,
Mike got a significant percentage of the 'evangelical' vote, but he also got some jewish,catholic, generally moral, fair tax, blue collar votes as well.
Mike's problem was not with his appeal, but with the double whammy of negative spin coming from the conservative media, (he's a pro-life liberal) as well as the doubts within the faith community that the GOP would ever elect a 'preacher' as their nominee.
We're not stupid.. nobody likes to 'waste' their vote. If conservatives had indicated that Mike was an acceptable candidate in their eyes, this thing could have been over after Iowa. He may not have won every primary, but like Obama he could have been propelled by a combination of personality and media support to a front runner status.
Consumers must be protected
Consumers must be protected especially now that they are suffering from the economic crisis that we have today. Most of them have lost their job and they are now struggling hard just to meet their ends. Sadly, there are institutions that instead of helping the consumers they would actually be the cause of the problem. ACORN is a slightly nutty organization. ACORN, a community organization group, founded by Wade Rathke, has started an empire of community activism that do things like pressure banks to make risky subprime loans and make them through its Self-Help bank partner, commit voter fraud, bully unions and get money from them, and they also commit acts that makes them guilty of rank hypocrisy. They’ve actually tried every method possible to pay their employees less than minimum wage, if at all. It doesn’t sound odd that an organization that wants higher wages for poor people to not pay their employees, does it? This ACORN fell a long way from the common sense tree.