| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Maine Democrats Slash Income Tax, Create Flat Rate
The Maine Legislature just pushed through a massive tax reform bill in the Pine Tree State. This was not just a token "move the chairs around" reform bill - it was far reaching, ambitious and will genuinely help move Maine in the right direction on this issue. The Wall Street Journal went as far as to call it the "Maine Miracle".
But here's the kicker - the bill was proposed by Democratic Governor John Baldacci, and overwhelmingly supported by Maine Democrats. The Maine GOP naturally had several problems with the reform bill - many of which were legitimate, but at the end of the day we still have to realize that taxes were shifted from compulsory income taxes that were "progressive" and graduated, to a virtually flat income tax, with a shift to consumption taxes.
Don't get me wrong, if I were in charge of reforming the Maine tax system it would have looked dramatically different and provided a tax cut more quantifiable and more far reaching, but lets be honest here folks, this is at least a step in the right direction.
Baldacci is quite unpopular in the state, but its hard not to admire a lot of what he has done in his second term as Governor. He had barely even been sworn in again, and already he was pushing to consolidate the 152 school districts in the state down to 26. He's also no fan of REAL ID, and was the first Governor in the United States to sign a same-sex marriage bill without being ordered to do so by a court - something I happen to consider a point in his favor.
Yes, I know, a few quality policies does not a good Governor make, and he still has things like Dirigo Health as major black marks - but still, he's done a lot right and we shouldn't be afraid to say so.
But whatever he has done right previously pales in comparison with the landmark tax reform bill he just pushed through and then signed. The bill reforms Maine's tax structure in a number of important ways, but the crux of it comes down to the following changes:
- The states draconian and punative progressive income tax rate which topped out at 8.5% has been essentially changed to a flat tax (you heard me) of 6.5%. The only exception to this is an additional 0.35% surtax charge for those making over a quarter of a million dollars.
- The state budget will be cut by 300 million to offset the losses, coupled with some tax loophole closings and extensions on the sales tax.
And to those critics of "tax cuts for the rich" that the new flat tax creates, Baldacci sounded off:
"Without employers, you don't have employees. The best social services program is a job."
Incredible. Well said, Governor.
Granted, the Republicans haven't had much of a chance to impliment this type of agenda since Jock McKernan was Governor (and he was hampered by an aggressive and hyper-partisan Democratic legislature), but it is to Baldacci's credit that he was the one - despite his party affiliation - who finally pushed through a comprehensive tax reform bill.
But, this betrays a larger question - why did Baldacci and the Democrats do this? Are they converts of a fiscally conservative agenda (no), or is something else going on here?
The answer is pretty simple. In 2004, Maine Republicans essentially split the Maine House and Senate 50-50 with the Democrats. Maine is not a blue state. Its not a red state either - as I've said before, its a gray state with a very slight blue lean, but it is completely winnable for competent Republicans with the proper message.
But Maine Democrats rode the anti-Bush wave in 2006, and the Obama wave in 2008, and are now in complete control of every level of government. However, now that they have power, unemployment is spiking high, wages are stagnant, young people are leaving the state and taxes are strangling the population. Those of us in the know smelled major Republican gains in the House, Senate and even the Governor's Mansion.
Add to that the fact that Maine Republicans seem to be getting their act together. Rather than the tired, poor choices presented to Maine voters in the 2006 election, there is actually an impressive crop of Republicans running for Governor in 2010 - cheif among them is Matt Jacobson, President and CEO of Maine & Company, an organization aimed at bringing businesses to Maine.
Jacobson has been carving out a decidedly pro-business, pro-growth, pro-jobs economic agenda for his candidacy, and it is already starting to resonate. Indeed, Jacobson has been described as a "human jobs machine", as his position is literally devoted to doing just that - creating jobs. In this environment, that type of economic message can quickly light on fire.
And Jacobson isn't the only one, other candidates such as Bruce Poliquin and Les Otten have cut their teeth in the business world, and will be hammering similar messages. Maine Republicans seem to have become clued into the fact that this brand of conservatism actually sells pretty well in Maine and are far more interested (for once) in talking about them now. For the next two years Jacobson and the Maine GOP will likely be hammering that message non-stop, hoping it will sweep them back into prominence.
But in this one move, Maine Democrats attempted to cut Jacobson and other GOP primary candidates, as well as the statewide Republican message model off at the knees.
They are now able to campaign on the largest tax cut in Maine history. They are now able to campaign on approving a budget that allocated fewer dollars than the previous year for the first time in three decades. They can campaign on making Maine's business environment more friendly, and its tax burden less cumbersome. Essentially, they out Republican-ed the Republicans, and may have just guaranteed themselves a continued majority for the forseeable future.
One wonders why national Democrats didn't take a similar strategy upon sweeping into power in 2008. Imagine if the Democrats pushed for a balanced budget, fiscal discipline, and preached a more conservative fiscal policy. After the Bush years and the gross excesses, massive government growth, huge budget deficits and fiscal irresponsibility that flowed from all that, they could have dealt a death blow to the GOP. But they didn't do that.
Luckily for Maine Republicans, they have no such history of hypocritical behavior while in power - partly because they have been on the outside looking in for so long. Thus, this newfound fiscal sanity by the Democrats won't necessarily be a crushing move, just a damaging one.
Fortunately (in a political sense), Maine has a long way to go in terms of taxes and business climate - they will still be in the middle of the pack for total taxation, and last year Maine was ranked as having the third worst business climate in the United States, and even this bold move won't suddenly mean Maine is out of the woods yet.
Matt Jacobson is still a phenomenal candidate, and the Maine Democrats have already claimed about all the seats they are probably able to at this point, so 2010 is still looking up for the GOP in the Pine Tree State.
But with a bold stroke of political brilliance, the Democrats may have mitigated the damage a great deal. I admire such a level of political accumen.
- Matthew Gagnon's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Thanks for posting
It's nice to see:
1. A post that's not a 'How do we fix liberals' post
2. Something about flat tax . . . I'm all for it.
3. That it is by a Dem.
I'm interested to see the end of the year when Obama said he was going to introduce major tax reform. Who know what the hell it's going to be, but this is an issue that Republicans should really being positively engaging now.
Most likely they're going to be complete obstructionist like on Sotomayor, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
It'll be nice to see what the effects of a flat tax is on a state. It's not all peaches and cream; it's a matter of identifying and minimizing unintended consequences.
Patrick, Soren, or Jon--could you check?
There are major problems the last few days. The spam attacks or something at the same time seem to have frozen "Recent comments" & is preventing the site from operating like it normally does.
THX
Thanks for posting
It's nice to see:
1. A post that's not a 'How do we fix liberals' post
2. Something about flat tax . . . I'm all for it.
3. That it is by a Dem.
I'm interested to see the end of the year when Obama said he was going to introduce major tax reform. Who know what the hell it's going to be, but this is an issue that Republicans should really being positively engaging now.
Most likely they're going to be complete obstructionist like on Sotomayor, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
It'll be nice to see what the effects of a flat tax is on a state. It's not all peaches and cream; it's a matter of identifying and minimizing unintended consequences.
Thanks for posting
It's nice to see:
1. A post that's not a 'How do we fix liberals' post
2. Something about flat tax . . . I'm all for it.
3. That it is by a Dem.
I'm interested to see the end of the year when Obama said he was going to introduce major tax reform. Who know what the hell it's going to be, but this is an issue that Republicans should really being positively engaging now.
Most likely they're going to be complete obstructionist like on Sotomayor, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
It'll be nice to see what the effects of a flat tax is on a state. It's not all peaches and cream; it's a matter of identifying and minimizing unintended consequences.
Thanks for posting
It's nice to see:
1. A post that's not a 'How do we fix liberals' post
2. Something about flat tax . . . I'm all for it.
3. That it is by a Dem.
I'm interested to see the end of the year when Obama said he was going to introduce major tax reform. Who know what the hell it's going to be, but this is an issue that Republicans should really being positively engaging now.
Most likely they're going to be complete obstructionist like on Sotomayor, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
It'll be nice to see what the effects of a flat tax is on a state. It's not all peaches and cream; it's a matter of identifying and minimizing unintended consequences.
browser freaking out
sorry for the multiple posts. not intentional
Hope, growth, and opportunity, ayup.
I'm certainly no expert, but wouldn't Maine be better for all of its residents as it's been in the past rather than trying to make it "business-friendly"? As for B.'s opposition to RealID, there are certainly valid reasons to oppose it. However, aren't his reasons invalid, in that he supports illegal activity?
well...
Better off how? If you mean going by to a logging / paper mill based economy, then no... the national economy is simply too different for that to really work anymore.
If you mean "quiet local charm and no built up cities" - then again, I say no. Not because I want to bulldoze the state and create strip malls, but because the charm of Maine and economic/business development should not be mutually exclusive. In other words, you can make it a positive place to do business and succeed without changing the nature of what the state is.
And frankly, if something doesn't make it more hospitable to conduct business, make money and raise a family, that "charm" won't matter much, because it will continue to hemmorage young people, state services will continue to increase while the income tax base decreases as the population gets older... its simply not sustainable.
Besides, if maintaining quiet, rural, natural charm of the state is your goal, punative taxes aren't the way to guarantee that. Its pretty hard to maintain a bed and breakfast on a romantic part of the coast when your bleeding taxes.
Once again
Once again, I'm not familiar with local issues there. However, some of the things above set off alarm bells. What safeguards are in place to assure the Jacobson doesn't raze paradise (or import "willing workers")? Recall that ME's governor already supports "willing workers".
Taxpayers........
Oil prices used to be sky high, and then everyone got a bit of a break when they plummeted along with retail sales and the rest of the struggling economy. If anyone thought they were going to keep getting discount gas, well they had better think again because oil prices are beginning to rebound, and there's going to be more family lending so that the average taxpayer and such can get to work every day – again. Big Oil is the largest and most profitable industry on earth (6 of the 10 biggest corporations are oil companies) and they will never worry about payday loans the way their customers do, no matter how low the oil prices are.
Local Business Directory Of Detroit U.S.A.
You got a really useful blog I have been here reading for about an hour. I am a newbee and your success is very much an inspiration for me. Please come visit my site Detroit Yellow Page Business Directory when you got time.
Local Business Directory Of Columbus U.S.A.
I found your site on google, great site, keep it up. Will return in the future. Submitted this post to Google News Reader. Please visit my site Columbus Yellow Page Business Directoryand give me any valuable feedbacks.