English - For All That Ails Us

4th-Fireworks

 

 

By  Rose Pedenko 

My father passed away in December of 2007 at the ripe old age of 104, just two months shy of his 105th birthday.  To the last year of his life, he swore thatVick’s VapoRub was a cure-all for everything that ailed him.  Who am I to argue, after all, he died of old age. 

It got me to thinking that the English language was very much like Vick’s VapoRub in our family and that it is likely the answer to much of what ailsAmerica today. 

A host of problems stem from an inability or lack of will by immigrants to grasp the basics of our national language.  “English-Only” legislation is perpetually thwarted by liberals, educators, and politicians to advance their respective misguided agendas—and we see the impact of the dismal results on our children.  Bi-lingual education in our schools has been an unmitigated failure. In less than 50 years, it also has become not only absurd but politically incorrect to be an English-Only adherent or proponent. 

The English language is the fundamental tool we use to read and thus understand the world around us. It allows us to thrive and succeed in this country -- unhampered by the limitations imposed by tyrannical governments or radical religions on its citizens around the world.  In America, thus far, we have been free to choose our own paths to self-actualization. 

Before any members of the PC crowd get huffy, my parents were legal non-English speaking immigrants from Mexico.  Total immersion into this English speaking culture was a necessity prior to the late 1960s, not an option.  There were no crutches to impede our progress like “Press 1 for Spanish.”  It was a sink or swim assimilation.  Becoming an American occurred almost effortlessly, not because we had no other choice, but, more importantly, because we wanted to be Americans. 

We spoke Spanish at home to be understood by our parents, and in turn, guided them through the initial language hurdles.  It was both a privilege and a test of their own determination to become American citizens, particularly at a time when citizenship classes and exams were not offered in their native language.  And I never once heard them complain about an unfair cultural challenge, or that the government should make it easier for them. 

Fluency in both cultures became seamless, and apple-pie-laden patriotism was our dessert. 

Today, many on the left laugh derisively over that little understood and antiquated fervor to become an integral part of the American fabric which was so inextricably woven into our flag 232 years ago. 

I’m not embarrassed nor hindered in this fervor for all things American by the likes of Bill Maher or David Letterman.  It is neither pedestrian nor witless to believe in the principles that made this country great. 

My parents’ children grew up knowing they are honest to goodness red-blooded Americans.  There was no “Mexican-American” moniker to identify or categorize us -- we knew who we were and are, and wear it with pride.  Our unaccented English paved the way into a society where the only person to blame for holding you back was yourself.  You choose success over failure, and it is not guaranteed or handed to you.  And that is the precious freedom held most dear by legal immigrants. 

This then begs the question, do we, by and large, create the prejudices that feed on themselves as a way to cope -- now that diversity has been shoved down our throats?  When we reject what it means to be an American, it creates baggage that should have been left at the border.  Today, immigrants have been taught they can have the best of both worlds.  They can retain their culture (which is the excess baggage) while taking advantage of U.S.freedoms and benefits without paying for it.  What remains are cross-cultural expectations that will never be realized because they no longer fully identify with either country. 

So many of the cultural problems we face can be traced to this forced acceptance of diversity, and a lack of language skills which impedes progress.  PC guilt, inculcated by do-gooder academics, has led to anger arising from lawbreakers earning rewards they would not otherwise be entitled to.  It made this week’s Supreme Court reversal of Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s prior ruling very sweet indeed. 

One language is the glue that produces unity, and unity in a people breeds strength.  Right now, unity and strength are sadly lacking in this country.  Our political parties are divided and our nation has been rendered weak by appeasement.  America is turning into a Tower of Babel by the left’s efforts to reach their Utopian ideal. 

The day we can all celebrate American holidays and traditions together, and bring those exotic ancestral spices to the table for the purpose of conversation, will be the day divisiveness takes a back seat to what drives this country forward--English. 

Happy Independence Day.

1
Your rating: None Average: 1 (1 vote)

Comments

You are just wrong about the state of the nation.

Right now, unity and strength are sadly lacking in this country.  Our political parties are divided and our nation has been rendered weak by appeasement.

You couldn't be more wrong about the state of the nation. There is more unity now than there has been at any point since 2000 (excepting the emotionally-induced outpourings after 9/11). You are projecting the dire state of your own political party onto that of the nation as a whole. However, if you look at the polls, you will see that as more and more people choose to not identify as Republicans, more and more people say the country is on the right track.

 

hahaha!

You are wrong NextRightNando.  This nation is as divided as ever.   Maybe a 61% approval rating for Obama is, to you, a sign of unity, but its about 39% short.  Math sucks, huh?

Most, if not all of Obama's proposals and agendas have been met with <about> 50-50 yay to nay.  We are obviously divided, just like we were in 2000 and ever since the beginning of the 2 party system.  Just because the Dems happen to be in control of government by a majority, does not automatically mean the country is united now on anything. 

I would also like to see your grand correlation laid out between people not identifying as GOP vs. people thinking the country is on the right track.  They are not related variables no matter how much you want them to be.  People not identifying as GOP is more an affirmation of displeasure with the party itself and in no way an affirmation of approval with the direction the Dems are taking the country. 

No, math is great. Your understanding of it, however....

First off, it is a bit rich for the party of Karl Rove and the 51% strategy to be complaining about division!

Secondly, I wasn't talking about presidential approval ratings, I was talking about right track/wrong track responses, which have climbed steadily since election day.

But, since you bring up presidential approval - at no time has there ever been 100%. According to Wikipedia, the 4 best ever are:

  • George W. Bush 90% (after 9/11)
  • George H. W. Bush 89% (after the 1st Gulf War)
  • Harry S Truman 87% (after V-E Day
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt 84% (after Pearl Harbor)

and then they sink back to normal levels. Both the Bushes as well as Truman also saw their approval swing by 60% or more during their time in office.

If, as you say, there is no affirmation of approval of the direction the Dems are taking the country, why has the number of people saying the country is is on the right track increased from 10% to 40%, and why does Barack Obama have a 57% approval rating compared to W's final figure of 25%? I'm not saying there isn't still a lot to be done, as anyone can see - I am saying that the sense of relief that you people are out of office and therefore are limited to the extent that you can make things worse is palpable.

The idea that the nation is horribly divided is bunk. We finally have the guy who is a uniter, not a divider, in the White House.

 

Right Track/Wrong Track is a lagging indicator...

...of presidential approval.

But you guys are both missing the bigger picture. Note that Ms. Pedenko never mentioned the president. That’s because she is talking about something much more important than political gamesmanship: guanxi.

Whether we like to admit it or not, America was primarily built by Europeans. Other cultures have contributed to & improved our society. We should respect those contributions & be grateful for them.

Multiculturalism has gone too far. It fetishizes non-American traditions. It encourages new immigrants to isolate themselves. A depressing fact is that in urban schools, minority students are teased for "acting white". Don't believe my cracker Republican white ass? Take Michelle Obama's word:

http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/1486879,CST-NWS-sweet20.article

Multicutluralism isn't just making life hard for minorities. It also calls on white people to disown their racial identity in order to attack mainstream traditions. It was this brand of multiculturalism that led to the murder of Pim Fortuyn.