| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
“At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter what the public thinks; it matters what 168 of us think.”
UPDATE: Chairman Emineth responds in the comments, and Matt Dabrowski, who knows Emineth, posts a blog on the matter here.
The Chairman of the Republican National Committee represents the 59 million Americans who voted Republican on November 4th, not just 168 party officials. And through county committees and state committees, WE elect the 168. We may not have a vote, but we DO have a voice. Make sure that the choice for the next RNC Chair represents YOUR hopes for the future of the Republican Party by making your voice heard at RebuildTheParty.com or ChooseYourChairman.com. -Patrick
I wish to alert many of my fellow young conservative activists to the quote in this post’s title. It comes from North Dakota Republican Party Chairman Gary Emineth in a story posted today at TheHill.com.
The story details Mr. Emineth’s call for a special meeting of the full RNC in order to attend the ATR debate at the National Press Club on January 5.
While is it commendable that Mr. Emineth feels the need to gather as many voting members of the RNC to this important event, I feel it would be remiss not to challenge the North Dakota chairman for his comment. It is, on its face, an extremely arrogant one which lends credence to the belief that the Republican Party is elitist and it is, at the very least, a slap in the face of those young Republican and conservative activists who have joined together out of a common concern about the direction of the Republican Party.
Whether it occurs at Rebuild the Party, the YRNetwork, the Young Conservative Coalition or meetings like the forum we held in Washington, D.C., in early December, I would submit to Mr. Emineth that it very much matters what we (the public) thinks about the selection of our party’s next chairman. We, as young activists, have the opportunity to put pressure on our state party’s elected leadership - even going as far as to vote them out if they do not listen to a group which will represent their donor and volunteer lists for the next few decades.
I wonder what the then 28-year-old Mr. Emineth would think of the present-day version of himself when he was serving as the executive director of the North Dakota party back in 1986? Would the 1986 version agree that it did not matter what a young person like himself thought about the future of his party? I would think that Mr. Emineth, the 1986 version, would have an outlook similar to mine.
I do not know Mr. Emineth personally, so I cannot judge the chairman any further than his call for a special meeting (which I applaud) and the comment in the report (which I admonish). It is my hope that Mr. Emineth will disavow his comment which, in my opinion, is detrimental toward the movement that all of us are trying to build.
If you are so inclined, I encourage you to make contact with Chairman Emineth in order to let him know your reaction to his comments. All that I ask is that you are polite and offer the chairman a modicum of respect.
Moving forward, I believe it is in our best interests to get as many young people to contact your state’s chairman, national committeeman, national committeewoman and executive director in order to communicate your desires as to the future of the party in your state, the GOP as a whole and who will lead us in the future.
- KRyanJames's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Asking for opinions on RNC Chairman
Ryan,
I invite all who want to share their opinions, that haven't, regarding the upcoming election for RNC Chairman to their Committeemen & Women- one each per state along with the state chairman=3 votes per state.
I read the comments made in The Hill and assure you and all who have read this that Members do seek input. The fact is that the membership votes. However, the input & opinions I receive are considered to enrich my decision that, indeed, impacts more than just the 168 members.
Folks can tweet their thoughts to me at www.twitter.com/robints or hit me on facebook. The best of our party is found in our principles & PEOPLE...I want, as others, your opinons!
Robin Smith,
TN GOP Chairman
I think it would be worth while...
...even if she declines the offer, to invite Gov. Sarah Palin to take over the reins of the RNC leadership position. This offer should be made publicly so that all of her supporters will have an opportunity to support whoever does become the designated leader of the RNC.
I would also very strongly suggest that any functions, private or public, held in connection with the naming of the leadership of the RNC, that Gov. Palin also be given an opportunity to play a part.
I would also suggest that the RNC does make this as big a media event as they can possibly create. I would suggest that all important meetings be video taped and archived and made accessible online. I would even suggest that a transcript, or at least the minutes (with digital indexing) of these meetings be included for public consumption.
Let me say this again, I strongly suggest that any and all meetings held by the RNC members be video tapes and archived. Afterwords, any material that may be considered sensitive, may be stricken from the public record. But all must be recorded.
ex animo
davidfarrar
What ideas would she bring to the post?
What ideas would SP bring to the post?
First and foremost...
...Sarah Palin would bring herself to the post. That's it. That's enough. By her mere presence she will communicate to the grassroots of the Republican Party that its leadership will no longer be an elite collection of old, money men, bent on keeping themselves in power and in control. A new day has arrived. Change is coming, to coin a phrase, to the Republican Party.
Sarah Palin, rightly or wrongly, is considered -- like all of us other grassrooters -- an outsider. If she can force her way to the top of the party, it would be an undeniable sign that the rest of us outsider - grassrooters -- still have a place within the Republican Party. What Sarah Palin is, in short, is nothing less than the physical representation of the grassroot base of the Republican Party.
Now I am sure the present leadership of the party doesn't see it this way. They think they can always whip up enough fear and loathing against Obama to motivate the base, and perhaps they can -- maybe not enough to win at the ballot box come 2010 and 2012, but enough to keep them in power. But the bottom line is, it will never come close to reaching the level of motivation Sarah Palin is capable of generating from the party's base.
So what we have here is a graphic illustration of the political struggle presently going on within the Republican Party between the old and the new. Who will win will be shown for all to see simply by where Sarah Palin ends up at the end of the day.
ex animo
davidfarrar
It is all about her - you are arguing for window dressing
I want to belong to a party of ideas, not a party of personality. You are making a case for her as a spectacular case of window dressing. She's "herself". "Her mere prsence". "Shey's a physical representation".
Where are the ideas? The policy solutions to current problems that people are facing?
She motivates the base - great. But motivates them to do what?? Do you think that a la's Saxby Chambliss she'll be most useful by showing up at rallies in each congressional districut in 2010? Well, then in that case, you are reducing her to a cheeleader. In the meantime, what is going to have transpired to make sure there is a good candidate in each district?
Sorry, ideas and policy solutions are first derived from ideals.
There has been a lot of talk about Sarah Palin, but few have questioned her fiscal conservative ideals. It is from these ideals that right ideas and right policy solutions will spring forth to deal with our current and mounting economic crisis.
At the present time, the base of the party has just been alienated by the last election through a primary process that largely did not represent their political values or ideals. They felt trapped, unrepresented, alienated. What they need now is a face they can trust at the head of the party. As McCain found out, much to his surprise, as Saxby Chambliss was to later find out; the grassroots of the party have identified themselves with her. This is fact, not fiction. It is this fact that will allow her to spearhead the up coming 2010 Congressional elections to a degree no other potential RNC chair nominee can duplicate.
As for you, sir; it is up to you to find your own political party. I wish you well.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Examples, please
Examples, please, of all the actions that Sarah Palin has taken to demonstrate that she is a fiscal conservative.
While she was mayor, Wasilla grew by 33%. During that time taxes collected by the City increased by 38%. She inherited a city with zero debt, but left it with indebtedness of over $22 million. $1m for a park. $15m-plus for construction of a multi-use sports complex which she rushed through to build on a piece of property that the City didn’t even have clear title to, that was still in litigation 7 yrs later. The sports complex itself is a huge money pit, not the profit-generator she claimed it would be. City Hall was extensively remodeled and her office redecorated more than once. These are small numbers, but Wasilla is a very small city.She hired a lobbyist to campaign for earmarks for Wasilla, and continuted to pursue earmarks for the state while governor. We all now know how phoney the "thanks but no thanks" line about the bridge to nowhere is.
Spending for the state of Alaska has risen since she took office. The 2009 budget spent $5 billion from the state’s general fund — a 34 percent increase over 2008.
The vast majority of Alaska's revenue comes from taxes that the rest of us in the United States pay on each barrel of oil produded in the state. There's no evidence she would know how to operate in a more "normal" state.
And her husband was until very recently a member of the anti-American "Alaskan Independence Party", and she has courted that party's support. If any other politician did that you would have a cow.
So let me get this straight...
...you think Sarah Palin is really a liberal, tax and spend Democrat, masquerading as a fiscal conservative Republican?
Now I've heard everything. LOL, LOL.
ex animo
davidfarrar
I think we are being told she is a fiscal conservative
by her fans and by herself - but I don't see anything in her record that backs it up.
Show me the facts that prove that I am wrong - and I'm looking for actions, not just speeches.
We are all..."looking for actions."
But if you are looking for perfection, grow up. We are talking pa...pa...pa... politics here.
As I have said, the only way to check a politician's action while in office is by clicking here -- the only real way to keep politicians true to their ideals is to have their own constituency become as powerful, or more powerful, than the special interests working to alter them.
Now for the first time in history we actually have a tool that can help purify democracy. All we have to do is use it wisely.
ex animo
davidfarrar
I'll take that as a confirmation that there is no evidence
If a Palin supporter as enthusiastic as yourself cannot supply what I am looking for (evidence that Sarah Palin really is a fiscal conservative) I will take it that it doesn't exist.
As for how to check a politician's actions while in office, here is a better tool.
It will tell you things like:
Sarah Palin was mayor of tiny town but yet spend $50,000 of taxpayer's money redecorating her office.
While gov, Palin charged the Alaska taxpayers a per diem for nights she spent in her home. And she took the family to NYC and put the kids up at the Ritz Carlton on the taxpayer's dime.
As a VP candidate, Palin was happy to accept the hundreds of thousands of clothes for herself, her husband and her children - until the media became aware of the story. The loot included silk boxer shorts and spray tan for her husband, and 13 suitcases with which to haul it all back to Alaska. RNC lawyers had to go to Alaska to get her to give it back.
Where is the evidence that she is a fiscal conservatice?
RE: No Evidence
Sarah Palin, as all governors do, spends the peoples money. However, Sarah Palin, as governor of Alaska, also gets the citizens paid. You know, that annual check each and every year the citizen's receive. She negotiates the amount that gets paid with the Oil and Gas industry. No other governor get's the citizens paid.
You need to understand an income statement. You know, income - cost of sales = gross profit minus expenses = net profit. Apply that to the alaska citizen and you will get your proof.
Oh, and shouldn't you be over at the daily kosmonaut trying figure out as to how to retain your majority. Rumor has it that your GLBTG constituency is fleeing left and right due to your candidate's unwillingness to provide affirmative guidance on gay marriage. LOL.
Personal attacks on me
That you went for cheap personal attacks on me demonstrates that you can't find anything in Palin's resume that indicates that she is a credible fiscal conservative. Heck, I would settle for evidence of good government. Look at this from the WSJ (note: WSJ, not Daily Kos) saying that her super-dooper pipeline might not ever get built. (You can also read another story on this topic from Newsweek, which is also not the Daily Kos.)
As for that annual check that Alaskan's get - it is basically paid for by you and me, becasue who do you think reimburses the oil companies for those royalities they pay? Did you know that despite being awash in oil and gas, prices for energy are 25% high in Alaska? Which means that Alaskans giving the money straight back to the oil and gas companies.
I can read a balance sheet just fine. For example, I can tell you that the Alaska Permanent Fund has lost about 20% of its value this year - $10B.
My friends, that's not fiscal conservativism or good government that we can believe in.
You want actions?
You want real fiscal conservative action on the party of Gov. Sarah?
Please click here.
ex anmio
davidfarrar
OK. She saved the state of Alaska $25K a year
OK. She saved the state of Alaska $25K a year. When she new the spotlight was on her and the cameras were rolling. Is that it? You've got not nothing else?
She can afford to be that self-sacrificing when the state is also paying her per diems for nights she spends in her own home, and when the taxpayers are paying for the family vacations.
USA Today:
WASHINGTON — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin calls herself a fiscal conservative who wants to "rein in government spending." She says she "reformed the abuses of earmarks in our state." Republican John McCain said during the last debate that his running mate has "cut the size of government."
But Palin didn't cut the size of government as mayor of Wasilla, and she hasn't done so as Alaska's governor, city and state budget records show. Spending in fast-growing Wasilla increased by 55% during her tenure from 1996-2002, records show. In nearly two years as governor, she has presided over a 31% spending hike by a state government that sought earmarks from Washington even as it reaped billions from higher oil prices and Palin-backed tax increases on oil companies.
Do you actually know the
Do you actually know the meaning of per diem, i.e. out of station allowance, you dishonest little POS?
As Governor of Alaska, where is Sarah Palin's duty station? Juneau - where the Governor's Mansion is. 500 miles away from her home in Wasilla. That you're stupid enough to fall for the idiocy that she got per diem for being "at home" when her official home, per the Government of Alaska is actually in the state capital shows the shortcomings of allowing just anyone to get on the Internet.
There's nothing immoral, illegal or even wrong about it. In Alaska and many of the other states where the same regime applies. Legally, she was entitled to money for hotel accommodation when she was at her office in Anchorage, but instead she drove 50 miles every day home to Wasilla.
And second, because you're an idiot, you seem to think that being a fiscal conservative must mean that one must "<i>cut the size of government</i>" under any and all circumstances, right? Are you really that stupid? So she should close down the schools? Close down the Wasilla Police Department and stop it from expanding as the city grew? Forgo repairing potholes in the streets? Are you out of your damn mind?
You must really think you're hanging out with the inferior minds at DKos to think just throwing out numbers like a NYT reporter without context makes a case for you. Here's a newsflash, Alaska is growing - so the budget as a matter of necessity will grow, and yet she was able to cut over $230 million in wasteful spending, slashing the construction budget (always huge in AK) down to bare essentials. That was in 2007.
And finally, those tax increases on oil companies? They're called royalties. She increased them and got a better deal for her constituents after years of the oil companies essentially paying the AK legislature off to keep them low. She ended that - that's pretty darn conservative if you ask me.
Look, just go back to Kos. What next? You guys were accusing Todd Palin of impregnating his own daughter at one point. If you're just going to throw mud and hope it sticks, why don't you go back to that?
Your post speaks for itself.
No response needed. Thank you.
That's what I intended it to do.
PS: I guess "needed" = "possible" in your thesaurus. What's the matter? You run out of monkey poo and mud to throw?
PPS: You're welcome.
No, I meant "needed"
your unhinged response makes my case for me.
Oh ... that was done with cool calm deliberation, young man.
How it computes with you that it makes all your false allegations against Palin any less stupid and any less false ... well, that's your problem.
Becasue when I suggest that there is no proof that she is
a fiscal conservative, and you respond with scatology and personal attacks, I know my case is proven.
All your "proof" that she was *not* turned out to be bull.
Not my problem.
I calls 'em like I sees 'em.
And your proof that she is
is ????? As thin as this column?
If you could spend all that time looking for false evidence ...
... you certainly can see for yourself; link
A Republican using facebook? Twitter?
I'm impressed.
I posted a response on my own blog
I just posted a response on my own TNR blog:
http://www.thenextright.com/matt-dabrowski/gary-emineth-is-one-of-us
Thankyou KRyan James...
...for shining the spotlight on this individual. I will do the same as Matt D (above). on my little Townhall blog and will link to your site. I will encourage none to give money to the GOP until this brazenly arrogant little snot resigns. Not that anyone is giving much $$ to the GOP anyway.
I doubt that any of our protests will do any good at all, however. The GOP/RNC is so immersed in this brand of arrogance, its beyond repair. I'm beginning to think. DD
CSPAN Broadcast of RNC forum
I understand that the forum hosted at the National Press Club on Jan. 5 for candidates for RNC Chairman will be broadcast via CSPAN.
Tune in!
RNC Chairman - comments indeed matter
My quote was misunderstood. What I meant was that only 168 literally vote. So the members of the committee, and in fact the entire party, needs to hear from the candidates as many times as possible. I wanted to give the candidates an opportunity to speak to the members and answer the tough questions as a body. I have not decided who I am supporting and felt there needs to be an opportunity well in advance of the vote - to address important issues to each state's strategy.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman
I am glad to read Mr. Emineth's response. I believe he understands how important his choice of words is.
As I noted in my original post, I applaud the chairman for calling together the voting members of the RNC in order that they have the opportunity to examine, first hand, the candidates for Party Chairman. I agree with his stance that we need to hear from the candidates as many times as is needed so that an intelligent and correct decision about our future can be made.
I still call on all young conservative activists to make contact with their state party's leadership, as well as committeemen and committeewomen, to make your thoughts as to the GOP's future known - and to remind them that they are our representatives to the RNC.
Noble Premise....Ill Timed?
Providing maximum exposure to candidates of whom one will become the lead strategist for the party comeback is a wonderful idea. However, shouldn't there first be a unified message which will serve as a standard of measurement?
Secondly, the method. Going it alone (ie Holding an RNC meeting without an official call from RNC headquarters in Washington) might smell of coup d'etat. The perception of internal splits only delays the beginning of the comeback. Shouldn't we appear as having one message, one voice?
Just some thoughts.
Why my continued skepticism...
Mr. Emineth says: "the entire party, needs to hear from the candidates as many times as possible"
What about hearing from the Base?? I want to pose a question to Mr. Emineth. Why is it that when the RNC wants to ask "us" for $$ they have no problems finding our address, paying for printing and postage, etc? But as for our opinions, concerns and actually "hearing from the Base" the RNC has proven that "it doesn't give a darn, at the end of the day, what the 59 million GOP voters think". If they did they'd prep an exhaustive survey [or series of surveys] designed to help them understand more precisely what the top concerns/issues are among the "diminishing" GOP Base. Mail them out. Using that same mailing database they use for begging money. Round up top analysts to pour over the results and then, maybe, it might be time to choose an RNC Chair. But, you see, they don't want to understand! Or be bothered. The Base is no longer part of the equation! We're way down on the list of RNC priorities.
No Mr. Emineth. We're on to you and the rest of the arrogant GOP Hierarchy. I do want to thank you for your brutal honesty, however. At least you, unlike the other 167, had the courage to reveal the absolute contempt that you have for all of us out here in flyover country. Darvin Dowdy
Right on, Darvin
For all their talk, both parties disdain their base, even fear it. As you correctly point out, if the 168 RNC members, or the RNC chair candidates, had any real notion about how to strengthen the party, they should be climbing all over themselves to set up various methods to include the party's grassroot base in on the process. Unless I have missed something, not one of the RNC chair candidates have suggested any such course of action.
It is commendable of Mr. Emineth to offer his suggestion for us to contact our local National Committee men and women, as well as the state chairs, but I wonder how many times Mr. Emineth has actually tried to do what he is suggesting?
Other than the state chair, who usually has a opening statement on the party's state web-page, how many state party web-pages list who their national committee members are as well as their contact information? Most simply list a party head quarter's email address.
How many state party web-pages have even bothered to set up any kind of polling devise on their websites asking who do the locally registered Republicans support for party chair? I realize this is all new stuff, but this is where we should be now as a party. In point of fact, we should be much further along than this. I would say that the Republican Party should be in a position to poll any member on the question of who they would like to see as the RNC chair as an important part of bringing the grassroots into the process.
But make no mistake about it, the bottom line is, the leadership of the party has not intention of allowing the base to speak, or to be heard.
ex animo
davidfarrar
YOu are so Right, Farrar...
...these party officials have set up a maze around them. And behind the maze is a mote filled w/croc's. The less contact w/the Base they have the better they like it. DD
Hey Ferrar...
...I guess I'm having to do a bit of an about face on Mr. Emineth since I read this: http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/26/meeting-eyed-for-top-post-hopefuls/
Appears he spoke, probably from frustration with the party hierarchy trying to push through a K. Rove pick for the new RNC chair.
Sorry Mr. Emineth but you need to understand the extreme level of distrust there is between the Base and the RNC Hierarchy. When you make statements like that, unexplained, well expect daggers. Ha! I can say, however, now - much positive has come out of this. The Base is now watching more closely as it should be. DD
Mr. Emineth. Will this meeting be open? Will you record it ...
... and have it made available on GOP.com, YouTube, LiveLeak, etc?
I am with you here, big time.
Lets have this meeting videoed, archived, indexed, and a transcript produced and accessable online for all GOP registered members at no charge.
Since I am a court reporter and notary who just happens to be transcribing more and more video meetings online, I will be only too happy to index, and transcript for any such a meeting, free of charge, and allow access of same online free of charge to any GOP registered member.
ex animo
davidfarrar