| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Whitehouse.gov
Mike Turk and Dave Winer discuss the new Whitehouse.gov website, each concluding that it looks good but has the potential to be much better. Winer writes...
The new whitehouse.gov is a nice looking site, it's centered around a blog. They promise lots of media, podcasts, videos, etc. In 2001 or 2004 even, it would have been a wonderful breakthrough and I would be singing its praise. But this is 2009, and we know so much more about the web.
Perhaps they're right, and the site can become more than it is now. I'm eager to see what the brilliant people working on Obama's web team will do over the next few years.
However, we're going to have to adjust our expectations.
There are just too many perverse incentives for a political office, contradictory incentives among the bureaucrats and officials and prohibitory rules within the bureaucracy for a government website to be too innovative. The Obama team is going to do some remarkable things, but they will be "innovative for government", not "innovative for the internet".
And that's the key. The Obama team doesn't need to focus on bringing new, cutting edge ideas to the internet. They need to focus on bringing the government up to speed on the things that are already commonplace for average people on the internet.
Remember, Obama was widely applauded for putting the Democrat's weeky radio address (and eventually the President's weekly radio address) on YouTube...even though putting a speech on YouTube has been quite ordinary for a few years now.
The new White House web team can do cutting edge work on the internet, but what they really need to do is cutting edge work on the government. To do that, they'll have to dial their expectations back to around 2005. We need to remember that these small steps for the internet are major leaps for the government. And that is success.
- Jon Henke's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Even the
Pope has a YouTube channel now:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jan/23/pope-youtube-channel
Obama's WH.gov
After what it did to President Bush, Obama's website can go f[redacted]k itself.
OK, I'll bite.
OK, I'll bite. What did Obama's website do to President Bush?
Well
Since Winer deleted a couple anti-BHO comments I left before the election, I'm going to guess his idea of an "exchange of perspective[s]" is a bit different from mine. Which is what it usually boils down to: who gets a seat at the table?
As for the blog, it has even less than what was there before. In Drupal terms (what TNR is based on), even getting back to where the old site was at would involve a custom content type representing a top-level news story coupled with a hierarchy of nodes of other types representing things like a video, transcript, etc. and connected to the top-level node through nodehierarchy or similar.
As far as comments are concerned, they'd get thousands and thousands and it would be unmanageable.
And, their attempts to solicit questions at their previous site were little more than a scam.
They should just try to re-create what was there before, with a little more multimedia.
I should clarify...
I think that it could be so much more given the Obama team's willingness to innovate. However, I think Jon is exactly right that the urge and willingness to innovate will be tempered by the cold realism of the counsel's office.
What they "can" do and what they "will" do will be dramatically different simply because most lawyers are lazy and take the "keep my client out of truoble" route. They will tell you "you can't do that" rather than "let's figure out a way to enable you to do that." As a result of the frustration that causes, I suspect you'll see the continuation of a lot of very talented people serving very short tenures in technology positions within the government.