| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Jim Webb won't be Obama's VP Candidate
Speculation is swirling around Jim Webb as a potential Vice Presidential candidate. Others have already covered many of the problems with this scenario...
- Webb and Obama have some fairly non-trivial policy differences
- Webb isn't very good on the trail and resists some of the necessities of campaigning
- Webb seems to dislike subordinate positions where he cannot focus on and advance his own agenda
Any, perhaps even all, of those could be routed around, though. But there is another problem: Jim Webb would completely trip up the Democrat's spin on John McCain.
In a 2000 New York Times article about John McCain - entitled "No Ordinary War; No Ordinary Hero" - Jim Webb spoke of McCain's "broad appeal" and said "McCain can appeal to all sides". Excerpting...
Even though Vietnam was a divisive war that is not yet resolved in the national consciousness, Mr. McCain can appeal to all sides. He is an inspiration to many veterans and conservatives [...] At the same time, many who opposed the war can nonetheless support the man because of his personal ordeal ...
This broad appeal is unique, especially because it is based on suffering rather than concrete battlefield accomplishments. [...] But a closer look brings deeper insight into why most Americans have come to hold this defining experience in such great esteem. [...]
But if there is insight into Mr. McCain's leadership style, it is with the question of how he worked to normalize relations with Vietnam. To his credit, the man who is so often criticized by opponents for divisiveness succeeded in working across the widest imaginable spectrum of interests in order to bring the Vietnam War and its aftermath to a full resolution. At the same time, as in his dealings with other issues, like campaign finance reform, his relentless pursuit of a solution to the normalization question and the singularity of his approach left a trail of bruised egos and avowed revenge seekers. [...]
And he created a perception in some circles that he would reach over allies to work with enemies by allying himself to Senator John Kerry, who once headed Vietnam Veterans Against the War, as well as providing political cover for President Clinton when normalization was announced.
In fact, these actions may be one reason for the rather surprising statistic that shows George W. Bush running as well among veterans as Mr. McCain himself. But the fact is, Mr. McCain succeeded, and he took the country with him. Yes, he used his prisoner of war credentials to their full impact. Certainly he could have been smarter and more respectful of the travails of others, and more conscious of buttressing his supporters as he reached out to his adversaries. But he took on the most contentious diplomatic issue of our time and pursued it to a satisfactory conclusion.
Resolving this issue may not show John McCain's ability to unite disparate groups, but it is certainly testimony to his ability to lead.
The problem is not that Webb liked McCain once and then changed his mind; the problem is that Jim Webb has made arguments that directly contradict the story the Left is trying to tell about John McCain. They don't want to spend the next few months trying to unspin themselves on this.
- Jon Henke's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Not really
Jim Webb would completely trip up the Democrat's spin on John McCain.
Both the New York Times and the LA Times endorsed McCain using language similar to Webbs. It's not Webb's take on McCain, it's the standard Democratic view of him.
Plus there's that little thing regarding Webb's views...
...on the Confederacy.
Webb's rebel roots: An affinity for Confederacy
He has suggested many times that while the Confederacy is a symbol to many of the racist legacy of slavery and segregation, for others it simply reflects Southern pride. In a June 1990 speech in front of the Confederate Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery, posted on his personal website, he lauded the rebels’ “gallantry,” which he said “is still misunderstood by most Americans.”
Webb, a descendant of Confederate officers, also voiced sympathy for the notion of state sovereignty as it was understood in the early 1860s, and seemed to suggest that states were justified in trying to secede.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10994.html
And we all know that for the Dems the Confederacy is barely one notch below Hitler's Germany.
But then again if they thought it would get them the "redneck" gun-toting vote while keeping the 95% of the Black vote.........
AND
Jim Webb was in the Senate less time then Obama, which could irritate the virginia audience
also Webb is a little nutty. And he let one of his staffers get sat on by cops transporting what was likely his gun
Well this is obvious! I think
Well this is obvious! I think Obama wanted better than Webb and he had chosen Biden to be his running partner. Their tandem really works as we can see and they won the 2008 election. Another thing would be the differences in beliefs and goals? New York Auto Show is normally a star studded affair, with a whole bunch of auto execs showing off luxury cars that no one can afford, nobody cares about, and break down in a year anyway. Well, the recession didn't stop them from doing it anyway, but this year's New York Auto Show was a stripped down affair. No short term loans were needed to put on the spread, but they still unveiled new models like the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee.