| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Hatred bounces
Paul Krugman makes a very good point about the dominant conservative media being full of "conspiracy theories and apocalyptic rhetoric". That's true (e.g.), and it's a genuine problem for the Right. I'm not sure the Right has come to terms with just how destructive an echo chamber is - and has been - to perceptions of reality and propriety (and yes, the Left has dived into their own rhetorical sewer, but tu quoque is no excuse).
However...
The ongoing efforts to conflate the Tiller and Holocaust Museum murderers with the Right, conservatives or Republicans - or to imply that criticism of government is responsible for these murders - is absurd and offensive. Would the critics change their political views if it turned out that one of the killers was a left wing militant? No.
What's more, it's not something any of the critics actually believe. Recall their outrage when Andrew Sullivan suggested that a fringe on the Left would fight against the US. Of the idea that this fringe on the Left would "ramp up its hatred in the days and months ahead", Duncan Black said, "Sullivan was one of the earliest adopters of the idea that the most appropriate response to September 11 was to figure how to to use it to pit American against American."
We've come full circle. The Left is growing comfortable with the role of dominant bully.
And contra some on the Left, objections to the DHS Report (both the Left and Right wing reports) were legitimate. The objection is not that they DHS studied the potential sources of violence, but that they made political generalizations ("the DHS description of these groups seems excessively broad with the potential for mischief"). It was political profiling.
Let's conclude with two central ironies:
- The Left strenuously objects to connecting President Obama to socialists and William Ayers; meanwhile, they want to lump all conservatives in with militant radicals.
- Meanwhile, as Doug Mataconis points out, "Conservatives who object to being tied to Von Brunn were eagerly associating Obama with Ayers and Wright."
UPDATE: Jesse Walker makes excellent points, as well. (via Instapundit)
- Jon Henke's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
All Conservatives lumped THEMSELVES in with the militants
except that guy on littlegreenfootballs, who said "dude? where's the beef?"
Yes, the left has whackos. We tend to say.... "Go Sit iN a Corner, no biscuit" CodePink is really dumb. nobody likes CodePink.
Not so the right, and it's persecution complex. By running around and playing the victim about a particular sheet of Police Advice from Homeland Security, you've chosen to associate YOURSELF with the nutcases who can't understand TOLERANCE of other ideas and methodologies.
And you claim the LEFT is victims?
What do I hear? "Why is Hollywood so antiConservative?" umm... because anti-heroes are cool? (I think it was Dr. Brin who had a great shpiel on this).
"Why wont' the media listen to conservatives? why are they so liberal?" clear confirmation bias, here.
Now you're stuck defending yourself, instead of saying "here, DHS, let us help you draft a profile of who to keep an eye on -- and hell, we'll help!" Any RESPONSIBLE tax party or political organization should have this on tap, so that they can call the police if someone looks a bit nuts (this to be defined as 1) has guns/weaponsOfMassDestruction 2) is acting like he might use them).
Knackers, try replacing CodePink with ACORN, eh?
I guess it's in the qualifier "tend to say", eh? Because CodePink is still well received at DNC conventions, in fact Michele Obama spoke to a group of CodePinkers at a group fundraiser in Denver in 2008. "Nobody likes CodePink", eh? Better check with Mrs Messiah when she has a second away from trying to invoke the spirit of JackieO back into the WH.
And then there's all those millions of corrupted tax-payer dollars being sent by the Democrat Congress and WH to ACORN for further voter fraud, corruption and waste.
Oh yeah, the Democrat Party really bitch slaps all those farLeft whacko types. All the way to the bank. Like former Veep AlGore said when caught by the press squeezing campaign dollars out of monks, "If they have money, we should be able to get some too. Do you think this sweater makes me look fat?"
why do you object to registering people to vote?
that's what ACORN does, you realize? they make sure people fill out a form properly. some people hired by them cheated, and were fired.
this is not corruption nor waste. this is the government privatizing something. aren't you for that?
Knackers, you gotta get out more...
I doubt anyone objects to people being registered to vote legally but ACORN now has a 14 state wide track record of successful litigation by local prosecutors and state attorneys general of proven voter fraud, money laundering for union groups, lying to state and federal officials --and that's in the areas controlled by moderate or GOP election officials.
God only knows the level of corruption ACORN and her Democrat Congressional pals engage in in Democrat strongholds where the voter registration lists haven't seen the light of day in 30 yrs.
Of course, now that ACORN's #1 advocate and former trial attorney are living in the WH, it's unlikely any responsible investigation will occur.
But for you and your Democrat Party pals, stealing elections are as good as winning them, right? Kind of like Kennedy in 1960?
Voter fraud is synonymous with the Democrat Party --going right back to Andy Jackson in 1824, 1828. The stain is permanent etched in the Democrat Party fabric.
albion's seed has spread far and wide, it would appear.
you don't sound terribly like someone from Michigan. are you from there originally?
off point
There is corruption, racism, vanity and what ever else in both parties, both sides. That's not the point. It's that the right . . . conservative america (not fiscal conservatives) have been tainted if not riddled with violence.
When McCain sends out an Obama is a secret Muslim mailing
and then a mosque gets attacked by poison gas... you don't see the connection?
When a man grows increasingly paranoid, and begins spouting the same paranoid delusions that Beck shouts on his television show... you don't see the connection? Even when he ambushes three police officers in Pittsburgh?
Like it or not, anti-semitism is just as conservative as Henry Ford. It's a reactionary belief, based on the increased mixing of society. This is just as conservative as the guy runnign for the RNC chair, who said that he got involved as a Republican because of interracial busing. Same deal, same shtick. Didn't like the government getting involved. Doesn't like brown immigration... That sounds a lot like superdestroyer, and other posters on here.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/6/11/741114/-Dr.-Satan!Come-Out!
Read that article, particularly the part about Reagan considering an amnesty for clinic bombers... there's quite a reason that the anti-medicine terrrorists are associated with the Social Conservative Right.
There are links, if you're brave enough to see them.
HOWEVER, this is emphatically NOT to say that every conservative is a doctor-killing, black-guy-shooting loonatic. I've been here long enough to know that most of yinz are good, god-fearing folk, and even when we have differences of opinion, we all manage to get along.
I don't yell at all conservatives. I yell at the hatemongers. I yell at those people who spread conspiracy theories, and legitimize eliminationist rhetoric and action. (which is emphatically NOT what Digby was doing, however ad hominem her attack on Limbaugh was).
They're organized, and they are NOT true conservatives, unless you consider neo-feudalists true conservatives (if you do, pardon, but I will take my leave.). It is NOT natural to think of the other side as the enemy. It is the same tired old dance that the rich always pull. Pitting people against one another, for the rich man's benefit. "He's getting your share! You'll suffer worse than he will!" (shall we talk credit card law? good example there).
People ask me a lot why I'm here. I'm here to remind people that thinking liberals do exist, and they do have good ideas to add to the mix. And that we're better off working together, arguing and laughing, than spitting flame at each other.
Republicans cannot clean house until they realize that the ugliness currently manifesting in America is not NATURAL. It is designed, and engineered, by a select elite. There's a reason why the republican echo chamber is much farther from reality (Bob Dole will win against Clinton!) than the democratic one (which is far more likely to be confronting reality and trying to change it -- why don't people believe EFCA will help them?).
Randall Terry just yesterday
Just yesterday Randall Terry was asked whether there is a connection between the Tiller assassination and the shooting at the Holocaust Memorial, and he said this:
And lets have a look at the Ann Coulter column, 6/3/09
And yet you say it is "absurd" to associate these acts with a rottenness at the core of America's right.
Merde: you are trying to rationalize shutting down Free Speech
...and you know this.
Basically, what the Brownshirt Left would like to do is to consider all political opposition to the Administration as extremist and lump it in with Tiller's killer and Brunn. That's why the Left is playing "connect the dots".
You want conservatives to shut up so you can pass America into a Eurosocialist Worker's Paradise. We won't shut up, so to shut us up you are trying to lump us in with White Supremacists, Nazis, and the extreme right militia people.
I strongly suspect that the American people are not as stupid as you believe them to be, and that this propaganda effort on the part of the Democratic Party and the Obama Administration will fail. There are simply too many fair-minded Americans to fall for this merde.
Allow me to assure you that I am a big believer in Free Speech.
Randall Terry and Ann Coulter have the right to say these stupidass things.
The leadership of right, if there is such a thing, has a responsability to condemn these stupidass things unless they WANT to be associated with them.
actually, I just want you guys to call the police
on the nutballs who think sending Mr. Rodgers death threats is a good idea.
You guys are sane... if it's your party that needs disinfecting (and right now it is), then get to it already!
Just a few months ago, some here were clamoring to do just this.
I recall a few posters on this site who were having the vapors when the right wing extremism report came out a few months ago and falling over each other to claim they were the very people the report was discussing. Any rational person knew the report was discussing the very types of extremists you are now concerned that conservatives are being lumped in with. It was totally mystifying to me why mainstream conservatives were actively trying to define themselves as extremists, given the commonly-understood use of that term (as you said, the white supremacists, Nazis and militia crowd). Maybe you can take a crack at explaining to me how that strategy made sense?
Our history- and humor-deprived Left
NextRightNando would like to "associate these acts with a rottenness at the core of America's right." Let's take a second look:
History lesson: John F. Kennedy said pretty much the same thing to great applause.
Yes, you're being absurd - with or without scare quotes - NextRightNando. The darling Miss Coulter was merely taking the absurd language that the Left itself uses to excuse abortion, "I wouldn't have an abortion myself, but I wouldn't want to impose my moral values on others..." and playfully illustrating the Left's absurdity. When Miss Coulter said, "Following the moral precepts of liberals" that should have tipped you off, NextRightNando, that you were reading an example of her talent for Swiftian parody. Any "rottenness" in those remarks is the rottenness of the baby-killing Left, NextRightNando.
How different the Terry quote looks when you only cite 1/3 of it
Congratulations, you have demonstrated that if you choose to only look at 1/3 of the Terry quote, it looks quite sane. Shame about the rest of it, though:
Somehow doesn't really have the ring of something JFK would say, does it?
fine. I'm all for killing babies, up to six months of age
(when they're close enough to being human that I start to get uncomfortable).
See, I'm no wishy washy liberal.
If you made me, I'd strangle my baby with my own two hands (I would of course find the most humane thing to do).
I say this after putting much more thought into the boundaries of my own ethical beliefs than most pro-life people ever do. How much money would you be willing to pay, so that your headless baby could live out one day before dying? Worse, how many other babies would you sacrifice so that it could live, for just one day?
Next, YES hell yes, I would change my political affiliation
if anyone from my organization was caught doing some dastardly thing like this. I would not change my Views -- but I would start a new organization!!! One simultaneously interested in confronting the violence, and advancing my viewpoint.
That's the honorable thing to do. To make a new voice, that shouts and screams and NORMALIZES a better political discourse.
By the way, you can feel free to connect Obama to European Socialism. It's entirely appropriate. It's just rhetorically a bad idea -- makes you sound old.
Ayers? no, just, no. this is like finding the one guy in the crowd who had a free mumia sign at the teabagging, and saying "oh, so you're in favor of freeing him? all of you?"
Uh...You might want to think that second irony out a little more
Wright and Ayers, like it or not, actually were connected to Barack Obama. Wright, in particular, had a very large influence on him. I think I'm safe in saying that most mainstream conservatives would have condemned von Brunn's views even before the shooting, and that von Brunn himself probably thought that the conservative media were just tools of the great Zionist conspiracy. Why would any reasonable person try to tie von Brunn in with conservatives?
Because he is a birther and a Freeper
Ummm...because he is a birther and a poster on Free Republic?
Gotta love those nutLeft loons like Nannie, eh?
Nannie, the operative part of the sentence you responded to was "any reasonable person". You hardly qualify as reasonable to anyone except those farther to the Left than you... I'm sure JonStewart or John Aravosis or MichaelMoore would, if given the opportunity, find you eminently reasonable. But then, those guys are from a special spot in the farLeft wing, just like you.
Of course, they probably use terms like "birther" to describe ProLife activists, just like you. And they'd probably really cheer on your anti-American rhetoric and hate-filled spite toward Pres Bush. But then, they wouldn't be considered "reasonable" even two clicks past your spot on the CrazyLeft scale by 90% of most Americans, either.
You failed the test on meeting the term "reasonable person", Nannie.
Could you provide some links or post some examples
of my "anti-American rhetoric"?
Sure, but it wouldn't prove any more instructive for you...
because your little mind is closed tighter than Vern's rutting herd. Or do I have that wrong?
Thank you for confirming
that you were just making a baseless slander.
Nannie, there's no slander in telling the truth...
or did you miss that in high school social science class?
Maybe you should lay off reading blogs and concentrate some time at your local junior or community college studying civics or polisci. It could only help you reach more appropriate and better informed conclusions.
Anti-American rhetoric and hate-filled spite toward former Prez Bush is you, 24x7.
Would you care to tell the rest of the choir
what your views are on:
Reid?
Pelosi?
Granholm?
Feingold?
Levin?
Stabenow?
Conyers?
Dingell?
Again, please provide links to or post examples of
my "anti-American rhetoric". Thanking you in advance for your cooperation.
What up Matt. "nutLeft loons"
What up Matt. "nutLeft loons" hahaha!! Hey, did you realize that today marks the end of analog tv? I'm polishing my shotgun in case it turns out to be the Rise of the Machines! haha! Keep it real bra! Peace!
oh,,, I don't know... you ever heard of Ron Paul?
half of his supporters were fully as crazy as von Brunn, and I don't mean in a "lets undo the Federal Reserve" sort of way...
When your base is the South, and you fuel the racist blatherings about immigration... you wonder why you're associated with race baiters?
I think you're
I think you're mischaracterizing the Sullivan fracas. Sullivan wasn't referring to a fringe on the left; he said the left is a fringe that collaborates with America's enemies. I don't see a parallel to this in how lefties are now characterizing the right.
You are incorrect. My point
You are incorrect.
Counter Culture
Each ideology has their extreme counter culture in which the parties have to compromise or reject. The problem with conservatives is the impression they have a closer association with the anti-government or anti-choice zealots. The right-wing echo chamber makes it almost impossible to disassociate from the zealots since both the goals of kooks and conservatives are basically the same, anti-choice or no government, etc. I would not be surprised if conservative politician realizes it is not in their interest to appear on Fox or Rush or RedState and take their message exclusively to the dreaded mainstream media.
I would also not be surprised when the abortion question is polled again that there is a bump in pro-choice support.
Pathetic comment
No Todd, the goals of the kooks and conservatives are not the same, don't be such a dumbass. Kooks are kooks.Murderers are murderers. No one in the mainstream of the GOP condones murder. Your attempt to link mainstream conservatives to these crimesis insulting and offensive and false. But it is very representative of the intellectual dishonesty of those on the left that are trying to make a connection between these crimes and conservative values.
I quoted this earlier, from a guy in Fayetteville, AR
that Reagan said he was considering an amnesty for clinic bombers.
Also, that Palin has refused to say whether or not she believes that clinic bombers are terrorists.
I'm hoping this isn't a large strain in Movement Conservatism, but there are reasons to link the two, including some of what has been said by politicians.
(agree with you on the pathetic comment. the people who want death and murder are not true conservatives. they're neo-feudalists. Any conservative who attends teabaggings is merely a dupe and a fool, not an active accomplice).
I don't think anyone asked Palin about that.
But Palin did condemn the Tiller Murder:
Governor Palin Statement on George Tiller
"I feel sorrow for the Tiller family. I respect the sanctity of life and the tragedy that took place today in Kansas clearly violates respect for life. This murder also damages the positive message of life, for the unborn, and for those living. Ask yourself, 'What will those who have not yet decided personally where they stand on this issue take away from today's event in Kansas?'
Regardless of my strong objection to Dr. Tiller's abortion practices, violence is never an answer in advancing the pro-life message."
Governor Sarah Palin
Earlier Governor Palin Statement
there is nothing about conservative values that says murder is
good.
Then again, there's nothing in conservative readings of our law that says we should suspend habeus corpus, either. Nothing conservative about 'experimenting' with something so radical as torture, in the full public view.
Like it or not, Republicans have gone after the white racist vote, in both subtle and blatant ways ("big buck" from Reagan, for example). When Republicans pass a resolution supporting the right of Georgia to seceed, they're fueling stupidity from some amoral people. This is not to suggest that it is Conservatism's fault that Republicans are stupid. I'm not so sure we really want to call them Conservative, at this point.
This post belongs in a Kos Diary
It's sophmoric and beyond stupid.
Real people who run real elections don't think of real registered voters this way.
Jackson. ever heard of good ol' Andy Jackson?
I have the utmost respect for our citizenship, even the massively xenophobic Appalachian bits of it. However, a spade's a spade, and until you accurately characterize what's going on, you will continue to dwell in ignorance.
one thing about kos: they deal in facts.
Political Goals
Hey Bill,
I didn't mean to give the impression that the conservatives condone murder and I apologize. I wanted to point out the obvious: the Tiller's murderer political goal (edited to clarify since I don't believe the museum murderer is associated with conservatism) and conservatives' political goal are the same. Moreover, my main point is the political danger conservatives face. What if the DHS report is right? How will conservatives respond if there is an uptick in radical violence associated with conservative issues. Just condeming violence will not be enough, IMO. I feel conservatives need to move away from the echo chamber that contribute to the anti-Obama hysteria and moderate their language. Crying 'socialism' is demonstrably false and ratchets up the paranoia kooks already feel.
Todd
Thanks for clarifying. I think we have a legitimate disagreement.
The political danger conservatives face? Its only a problem if the left tries to make it an issue. For example look at that bastion of truth seekers, Kos. They diarist say s that Fox News barely covered the story of the Holocaust Museum murder. The fact is they had wall to wall coverage all day. Shep Smith and Neil Cavuto covered it without commercial interruption for quite a while (I only know this because I was on the treadmill watching it). I saw Shep Smith interview Von brunn's ex wife yesterday. Why do i bring this up? Read the Kos comments. You want to know where the hate is coming from?
You point out that the Von brunn murder has no association with conservatism. But look at the stretch here . . .Fox News gave the story 1 minute and 50 second of coverage on their evening newscast, therefore conservatives know they are. . . guilty? Here is a representative comment from a Kos scholar:
Hmmm . . .the guy was a white supremist and a 9/11 conspiracy theorist. The evidence in his car indicates he may have been headed to the National Review next. The guy is a loon, hates evrybody and evrything, but . . .it a right wing issue? And this poerson doesn't feel that they are adding to the hate?
The issue is that the left is creating an issue where there is none. People are responsible for their own actions. Personal responsibility. And no one on the right should feel that they have to defend the actions of loonatics.
Very meta.
The question was how will conservatives respond if there is an uptick in radical violence associated with conservative issues, and the answer given was to complain about how FOX News is characterized on Daily Kos.
Very meta.
The political danger
Try reading, dipshit.
I did. Both times.
I stand by my observation. Why so tetchy?
barely covered it on nattional news.
During the day of the murder... (4+ / 0-)
Shepard spent hours on coverage of this event...and of course was criticized by the RWSM for it...
Obama - Real Leadership for a Real Change
by dvogel001 on Thu Jun 11, 2009 at 03:22:35 PM PDT
[ Reply to This |Recommend Hide ]
you know, you cant' exactly control who comments.first. and other people on the site are making the same points you are. (sanity and front page diary comments don't always go together. humor is much more likely as well. please check your snarkometer often)
The left has plenty of race baiters
Jeremia Wright is a racist. The worst kind of racist, one that preaches from the pulpit. So if the left can conflate the Holocaust Museum shooting with the right, they also have to include the Jerermia Wrights of the world (and Jesse Jackson, who as also made anti semetic remarks).
Absolutely.
This is also Wright complaining because the President won't give him the time of day.
Now, now, there's plenty to call out Mr. Wright on,
from the spreading of conspiracy theories on national television. But you do have to admit, he belongs to a white denomination. That's not the normal behavior of a racist, is it?
(I of course, condemn his comment. he's flamboyant, allright... did he think he was being truthful (rahm emanuel??). either way, he needs to apologize, as Jesse Jackson has.)
Shame be onto their names, they who would prey on our differences. May they step into the light, and be cleansed of their hatred. In the end, we shall all be judged by our Maker. May they have time enough to repent, and with good deeds cleanse their names.
Paranoia and fear is synonomous with conservatism
Whether it's elected poticians, talk radio, right wing websites, and Fox News, movement conservatism is the daily ginning up of fear and paranoia in the base.
There's Glenn Beck on Fixed News talking about FEMA concentration camps and comparing Obama to Hitler. Bill O' Reilly claims there's some secret cabal between Obama, NBC, and ThinkProgress to smear him. Fox News had segments accusing Obama appointees of all sorts of garbage, like claiming Harold Koh wants to impose Sharia law in the US.
You have people like Michelle Bachman claiming Obama's trying to create reeducation camps for children.
Movement conservatism has been stoking up this paranoia for 3 decades and want to feign ignorance. It's been part of your electoral strategy since Nixon.
Funny how conservatives didn't blame the DHS report on the proper person, that being George W. Bush.
Agendas and bias
Thanks for posting this topic!
1. There's no shortage of behavioral biases caused by ideological biases i.e. noone's perfect and people pick favorites.
2. There's out-group homogenization on both sides. I know few people who would tattoo 'Liberal' or 'Conservative' on their arm. Yes, you find those people on the internet, but in real life people are a mix.
3. There are nuts every where and if there isn't a reason for them to be nuts, they'll make one up.
--------------------------
That being said,
1. Right-wing violent extremism has a long and glorius history in the US. Hate groups have been around for a long time. Those groups could not exist without complicity from moderates. Left-wing violent extremism has had a few moments but generally is relatively un heard of. The sixties probably was the best time for those guys.
2. The MSM was always liberal biased, but right-wing media has become an anti-liberal screed. Paul Krugman should stay to economics . . . but he's not THAT wrong. Hannity, Limbough, Coulture, Beck, Krauthammer, Ingram, O'Reilly, Kristol,and on and on are patently anti-democrat, anti-liberal, anti-journalist (although I don't think that of Krauthammer) and are consciously inflammatory.
3. People are going to tie the violent nutters to the right because what else do you do? They don't go hand in hand, but there's such a big corrolation that it's hard not to.
I live in the city. I like white people moving into my neighborhood. But that's not because I dislike black people or hispanics. It's just I have yet to meet a white person trying to break into my garage, spraying graffitti on my wall, peeing on my house or stealing things from my yard. Most of my neighbors are black and their damn fine people; however, it's just the human in us that has a hard time avoided a strong corrolation.
You can accuse the MSM of bad journalism . . . hurrah! But when gun sales go up after a republican presedent is elected . . . that's when I say lumping violent extremism with the right is total B.S.
sheesh! gunsales are up because the NRA wants
a bigger profit for gun manufacturers.
that's all.
or maybe it was invantory clearance
they were getting rid of '08 models.