| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
U.S. House votes to legalize new form of bank robbery
The U.S. House tonight voted to approve a "mortgage relief" act which now permits a new form of bank robbery.
It's called the "mortgage cramdown".
You see, if the value of the your house has declined in value, now you will be able to file bankruptcy and reduce the principal amount of the debt down to the present, beaten down value.
Then in a few years, when inflation rears its ugly head and the nominal value of homes rises guess what? The mortgage principal is permanently reduced. And our profligate borrower cashes in on a windfall, while his lender is stuck the removed principal, never to see this money again..
Now, ok , well maybe some poor downtrodden folks deserve some good luck. But, my friends, the U.S. House actually voted to let people who lied on their mortgage application get this relief.
Writing off mortgage principal to a consenting adult who borrowed more than he should have is simply a bad idea. It rewards bad behavior. It will only encourage another housing bubble.
I understand the desire to slow the wave of foreclosures and space out the readjustment in the housing markets. And yes, their are honest folks who can make a go of it. But reduce their interest rates to current market; stretch the loan term; turn the arrearages into a zero interest bullet at maturity. Jeez, there are plenty of fair ways to help a borrower. (not that the servicers for investors like Countrywide try them very often) And that do not cause the borrower to renounce the basic obligation to either pay back the loan or give up the house.
Minnesota's Michelle Bachmann said this bill was “a tax on all the responsible homeowners. This is the last thing homeowners and our economy need.”
Let's hope her attitude goes into overdrive in the Senate. We need to find 41 members with non wobbly knees to either fix this bill so it does not reward greedy borrowers or to send the thing back to Barney Frank with a strong message attached.
- Ironman's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Yup. because it was banks SOP to get people to lie
on applications, that way if they ever wanted to default on the mortgage, they could go to court.
Let's face it: the banks made stupid loans. They are fundamentally bankrupt. We can either try to save them AND our communities AND our commerce (where Our should be understood to mean California's), or we can just let the whole damn place burn.
Your choice.
Imagine paying well over 50% of your current income to housing... not a pretty picture, is it? Now, imagine, as if you were in southern california, and everyone has lost their jobs,a nd yet they are still going to have to pay that much.
Their best option will continue to be bankruptcy (aka jinglemail), which would kill the banks dead. The closer to a "fair and equitable" solution that congress can come up with, the fewer will take that route.
Do you relish the idea of mosquitos breeding in your neighbor's pool?
Or Lynx?
When two folks agree to lie on a federal form....
both are at risk of going to Allenwood.
I think I documented there are a lot of pro-debtor fixes which don't involve the illicit windfall and moral hazard of cramming down principal. Me thinks the Congress is flailing away and are going to pass of lot of laws of unintended consequences in order to "help people". And will make matters worse. Sigh.
which of the pro-debtor fixes do you favor?
(not always do people know that they're lying, if the guy in authority (whitecoat) says to do something, people often do it, even if it's immoral or downright evil. Let alone when they may not even bother to tell the shmoo (loan recipient) that what they're doing is illegal)
also, unless the agreement is in writing or audiotaped
proving it is a bitch, and finding a lawyer etc to go up against the big guns of the real estate company / bank ... not easy.