Lame Keith Olbermann alma mater chokes in national final!

Coulter claims that "There's no physical evidence for [evolution]", and insists in her 2006 book Godless that there is "no proof in the scientist's laboratory or the fossil record."

Don't you think Ann Coulter had to pass various scientific courses to graduate Cornell? What about Ivy League educated conservative radio host Dr. Laura Schlessinger who's main degrees are in biology, science, and physiology that think the evolutionist theories are crap? Is she just crazy? Not qualified enough?

Coulter wrote:

It may seem cruel to reveal the true college of someone who already wakes up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat worried that he's a fraud. But I believe that by pointing out that Olbermann actually is a fraud, I am liberating him.

You may not realize it now, Keith, but you will look back on this day and say, "That was the best thing that ever happened to me!"

Finally, you can stop pretending that you went to the hard-to-get-into Cornell.

Coulter attended the real Cornell? Sigh... I can feel the value of each Cornell diploma shrinking with every day Ann Coulter remains outside of a coma. :( I am glad that pompous Olbermann need not have to 'actually' appeal to Coulter's sense of authority.

It would be really interesting to get inside Coulter's head. It would be disgusting, too, but if I can gleefully prod around a fish's half-digested stomach contents I can probably tolerate this. Is she so ignorant that she believes what she writes? If so, which mental illness does she have? Maybe instead she is just an unscrupulous businesswoman who has figured out that there is a LOT of money in intellectually (and otherwise) whoring herself to the far right. I have even wondered if she's a liberal trying to embarrass the far right, like Stephen Colbert but she is the only one in on the joke and she'll write a tell-all from her death bed.

I wonder what her new book will be called.

• Godless: The Church of Liberalism [2006]
• High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton [1998]
• How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)  [2004
• If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans [20007]
• Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right [2002]
• Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism [2003]

Perhaps "The moon is made of cheese also!" She will condemn liberals for suggesting that a cow did not jump over it.

I happened to read all of the science-related (that's applying the term "related" very generously) stuff in Ann Coulter's awful, ghastly, ignorant book, Godless,  and it's a bit overwhelming. This far right-wing political pundit with no knowledge of science at all has written a lengthy tract that is wall-to-wall error (one very broad claim that Coulter has made repeatedly, and that is also common to many creationists is that "there is no evidence for evolution") : To cover it all would require a sentence-by-sentence dissection that would generate another book, ten times longer than Coulter's, all merely to point out that her book is pure garbage. No one would be interested in writing such a lengthy rebuttal, and I'm sure that's exactly what Coulter counts on--tell enough lazy lies, and no one in the world will have time enough to correct them conscientiously. She's a shameless fraud.