UAW

Step away from the vehicle, Senator Dodd

I've allowed the dust to clear after last week's late night auto bailout debacle. In the passage of time, Senator Dodd's performance looks sorta like this

Go to fullsize image 

Several weeks ago, Senator Dodd was appointed the Senate's point person on the auto bailout. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/manufacturers/3711734/US-Senate-close-to-14bn-auto-bailout-deal.html The evening of the critical vote he claimed there were just "some issues that remain outstanding"

Hmm...like not having enough people in your own caucus behind the deal.   http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/12/senate_democrats_had_enough_re_1.asp

Not really addressing the issue of competitive employee compensation http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081212/ap_on_go_co/congress_autos this year...not 2011..when GM is losing money at a titanic pace http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/13/BU5KV10HF.DTL 

and allowing the Republicans to control the final negotiations  http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081213/ap_on_go_co/autos_corker

Indeed, one wonders why Dodd bothered at all, since he seemed to not care what sort of dreck the federal government generated on an issue of rather pressing concern...saying of Bob Corker

"If perfection was supposed to be his goal, he was sent on a mission he could never complete,"

Well, Chris, we know never to expect perfection from your efforts in the Senate. But we have learned to expect petulance and finger pointing after your failures http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hcu-autobailout-1212,0,6886086.story

An effective chairman would have rounded up his votes and forced some form of temporary compromise between the GOP and the UAW to pass a bill that offerred some meaningful relief. But after the TARP disaster, http://www.thenextright.com/ironman/chris-dodd-on-the-bank-bailout-yep-i-pulled-a-plaxico  Chris Dodd's delivery skills might be better employed at Domino's   

It's not just that Dodd is a liberal, or as my CT compadre Artful Doddger points out, his act back home is wearing very thin http://theartfuldoddger.blogspot.com/2008/12/this-was-not-good-weekend-for-publicity.html. It's that he just isn;t very effective at what he does anymore. And after almost 30 years in the Senate, there's little reason to expect improvement.

The irony, of course is much as the Bush adminstration does not want a GM bankruptcy on the record, they also do not want to be directly blamed for creating "American Leyland" . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Leyland Hence,  while they may permit the use of TARP cash to tide over GM and Chrysler, they may not be a whole lot more lenient than Bob Corker was http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ac2c623a-cafe-11dd-87d7-000077b07658.html?referrer_id=yahoofinance&ft_ref=yahoo1&segid=03058

This will kick the can down the road a piece. Upon further reflection, I would suggest that the DC wizards think about a few other issues than whether GM ought to replace its CEO http://www.thenextright.com/ironman/message-to-senator-dodd-you-first

The always inquisitive Michael Barone suggests that beyond pay packages, union work rules have to be redone for the domestic firms to become competitive http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2008/12/15/who-is-at-fault-for-the-decline-of-the-big-three.html

I would also suggest to the "save the planet" people out there that the market is indicating that in the immediate term, a massive retooling to electric cars is going to be an exercise in fiscal insanity. If Toyota doesn;t see that much of a market for the Prius until maybe 2011,  http://www.courant.com/business/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-toyota-plant,0,7578590.story, perhaps a more prudent short to mid term strategy for Detroit  might be to maximise revenue selling conventional vehicles? 

Sure it's unplesant and dull, but I've yet to see anyone explain how this works even for the purposes of postponing a bankruptcy until better economic times unless the Detroit 3 cut costs and sell profitable cars http://thenextright.com/ironman/can-hope-change-a-spark-plug

(as an aside, I figured out why the image is a) Detroit only sells big SUV's and b) no one buys their cars. I was in lower Fairfield County this morning. That's the deal down there--the only GM products I saw were Escalades and Tahoes--yuppies assume that's how it works for the whole country)  

I might also suggest much as the auto industry is a big picture, it isn't the biggest picture. Since the election of Obama, we have seen the Dow plummet and recover, but as the zeroes on the proposed stimulus package get larger, the value of American currency gets smaller.

 http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=USDEUR=X#symbol=USDEUR=X;range=3m

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=USDJPY=X#symbol=USDJPY=X;range=3m

Maybe its time to ask Senator Dodd who gets to bail out Uncle Sam?

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, makes a phone call following the Senate's rejection of an emergency $14 billion loan bailout for US auto companies, Thursday, Dec. 11, 2008, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Carmakers need Delta Model, Not UAW Bailout

The hard reality is that the Big Three automakers could be facing bankruptcy if they don’t get a combined $14 billion in “loans” in order to stay in business and support their business model. However, the reality is that this is really a bailout of the United Autoworkers who need this bailout to keep their wages and benefits even as General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler go down the tubes.

Everyone has been talking about how we need manufacturing jobs and not bankruptcy of the Big Three. However, I will give you the reason why Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler need to pursue a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. I give you Delta Airlines.

As early as 2004 and in to 2005, Delta pursued cost-cutting measures that ended up cutting service, but did nothing for both executive pay and the pay received by union employees working for Delta. Everything came to a head with the company’s Chapter 11 filing on September 14, 2005 citing fuel prices and high labor costs.

While the company was in bankruptcy, unionized airline pilots took a cut in pay of 14 percent, executive officers took one of 15 percent, and CEO Gerald Grinstein took one of 25 percent. Also, the company laid off somewhere between 7,000 to 9,000 of the 52,000 employees.

On April 25, 2007, Delta had their bankruptcy strategy approved and emerged from bankruptcy five days later. This proves that a Chapter 11 filing will not kill a company, but restructure it so that it can function free of constraints from management and the unions and make a profit in order to stay viable.

According to the Heritage Foundation, GM, Ford, and Chrysler are paying $73.26, $70.51, and $75.86 in per-hour wages and benefits respectively. By comparison, the foreign carmakers like Toyota, BMW, Nissan, Honda, and Mercedes are profitable thanks to their locations in right-to-work states like Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, and South Carolina at a fraction of what the Big Three pay in wages and benefits. This does not include the new Kia plant that will employ 2,500 new autoworkers in West Point, Georgia at just $17 per hour in wages. On a side note, the average American makes only $25.36 per hour in the same category.

Business executives and owners (past and present) are irritated by the difference in the earnings between the two biggest car-selling companies in the world, GM and Toyota. Last year, both companies sold 9.37 million cars each. The difference became the labor costs with GM posting a loss of $38.7 billion (a loss of $4,130.20 per car sold) versus Toyota making a profit of $17.7 billion ($1,889.01 in profit per car sold). The Big Three are fighting a losing battle thanks to the UAW who wins if the bailout passes.

What would be simple to avoid any bankruptcy would be for both sides to agree to necessary pay cuts. The UAW isn’t willing to do it because they will lose all leverage in negotiating. Where are the CEO’s telling these union thug bosses that they can either have their jobs at a lower wage or have no jobs at no wages?

All of this has led to Americans losing sympathy for the unions, who have been noticeably absent in the media’s coverage of the ongoing behind-the-scenes work on the bailout. As it would turn out, there are reasons why the American people no longer want to support the unions.

First, more Americans work in white-collar jobs that pay higher wages and provide more benefits because of the skill and education required to obtain and keep those times of jobs. When Americans were making more money during the 1980’s during the Reagan years and the new types of business leaders that were making changes for the better while maintaining and increasing profitability, the sympathy for unionization went out the window and down the drain.

Second, there are the list of high-profile unions that have gone on strike and why they did. Consider that in my lifetime, the biggest strikes were in Major League Baseball, the National Football League, the National Basketball Association, the National Hockey League, and the Screenwriters Guild. All of them wanted just one thing: more money.

When you have even the bluest of blue-collar workers being told to support millionaires on strike, even they begin starting to think the unions have outlived their usefulness. No longer are they fighting overbearing bosses, dangerous working conditions, or oppressive hours. The unions are fighting for the almighty dollar and for political influence and clout.

It’s time to tell the automakers to drop dead to force bankruptcy so that we can restructure the costs of the manufacturing sector so as to compete with the global economy. As long as we are bailing out failed companies in pro-union states thanks to the unions at the expense of taxpayers in successful right-to-work states, America will never be able to compete with the rest of the world.

Syndicate content