Robert Gibbs

Obama's "Jive" $100 million "budget cut"

The New Ledger has already suggested that the alleged $100 million budget cut means Barack Obama can;t do math, or think's we can;t. 

I have a different take. He's just getting deep into the car business.  Let's compare a $3/7T budget with a $100M reduction.

It would be like cutting the price of this vehicle by $ 1

 

 

 

 

Tahoe LSTahoe LS

2WD starts at $37,915* 

Evidently the WH press corps isn't buying the sales pitch  

Maybe they'll realise all they are going to get from "Brother Gibbs"is "jive talking"    

Bonuses at AIG? Don't blame the GOP!

A couple of news items from that noted right wing message machine--MSNBC.

First, this..AIG’s turmoil depletes Obama’s political capital

President Obama's apparent inability to block executive bonuses at insurance giant AIG has dealt a sharp blow to his young administration and is threatening to derail both public and congressional support for his ambitious political agenda.

I notice my own Senator, Chris Dodd, has finally found his voice about this debacle.

I warned them this would be met with an unprecedented level of outrage," Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.),

No, Chris, What should generate an "unprecedented level of outrage" is that you wrote the TARP bill and failed to put appropriate safeguards in the bill to protect the taxpayers.

In October the Hartford Courant wrote 

 And whether you call it a bailout or a rescue of the U.S. economy, the Connecticut senator's fingerprints are all over it. 

Do we need CSI:DC to figure out why there isn't effective compensation limits written into the TARP bill? Oops opensecrets might have an answer. $175,000 in reasons for leaving AIG honchos alone.

Maybe that's why you "pulled a Plaxico

Well, he's not alone "Jive talkin""Brother Gibbs" assured everyone he "was confident" he knew what AIG was doing with its $100 Billion plus in bailout cash. Right.  

You know, maybe properly staffing the Treasury Department might be more important than insulting Rush Limbaugh right about now.

So we know the Obama team is flailing around dealing with AIG.

 We can be sure today's meme is : We inherited this from Bush.

MSNBC offers a different take.   

In a story entitled Congress played major role in AIG bonus mess they point out the roots of the meltdown of AIG were planted before George W. Bush set foot in the White House.  The reason AIG collapsed was it was overexposed in insurance of exotic derivatives that went poof along with the mortgage securities that were their underlying asset. And why was this market so weakly regulated? 

After the 1998 collapse of Long Term Capital Management, a giant hedge fund that pioneered the use of derivatives, the Fed engineered a rescue to prevent the unwinding of risky bets from spreading to the larger financial system. That brought calls for tighter regulation of derivatives, including a push for greater derivatives regulation at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, led by a former Wall Street attorney named Brooksley Born. 

But strong opposition to the proposal from then-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and senior Clinton administration officials sank the idea. On Dec. 21, 2000, President Clinton signed into law the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which further eased restrictions on derivatives like credit default swaps.

The new law cleared the way for an explosion in credit default swaps. In the first half of 2001, there were $632 billion in credit default swaps outstanding, according to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. By the second half of 2007, that number was up 100-fold — to more than $62 trillion.

So much for the "greatest economy ever". And if I recall correctly Lawrence Summers--now Obama's "adult" on economics policy--was Treasury Secretary then.

I'll make one final point on the "we can't sue. They have a binding contract". This comes from an old banking lawyer.

Yes. You. Can. 

You may lose the suit. You may pay more to the executives. You will pay lots of legal fees (Wall Street law firms are laying people off: think of this as a stimulus program). But a bank can and will undertake litigation for strategic reasons where the chance of success is remote.

Why. Moral Hazard.  

Screw the AIG execs. Let them sue you in a court in Manhattan where half the jury pool are going to be folks laid off from Wall Street. Good luck.

You make the cost of doing things you don't want so high other people don't try it.  That's how you prevent "moral hazard".  The Obama team has set a very dangerous example in the AIG bonus debacle; they are rule bound sissies who let themselves be rolled rather than picking a fight they could lose. 

Hope Vladimir Putin and the mullahs in Teheran weren't watching. 

 

"Jive Talking" from W.H. flack "Brother Gibbs"

Evidently White House hack and flack Robert Gibbs had a rough go of it today trying to explain his way around the President's mutually inconsistent statements on the economy

Some examples of what NRO's Gehrarty called mockingly  the "Master of Nuance

 http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/03/16/gibbs-sound-is-completely-different-than-strong/

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/video-wh-spokesman-explains-difference-between-economy-being-strong-and-sound/

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjMxOGE2NjlmYmYzYmNlYzEwYWNkMmU5ZmI3MjE1ZGI=

Guess life was easier when corporate barons paid him to trash Howard Dean.

Well ,since we are headed headlong into a reprise of the 1970's, I suggest this theme song truly applies to the latest "Brother Gibbs"

Give this a look. Maybe he oughta go for the same wardrobe

Yep, this does sorta sound like the Obama media circus of late

Its just your jive talkinYoure telling me lies, yeah

Jive talkinYou wear a disguise

Jive talkinSo misunderstood, yeah

Jive talkinYou really no good 

 

Who put the hit out on Tom Daschle?

 Go to fullsize image Sometimes when a bomb goes off one oughta ask: who planted it? In the case of the Daschle debacle, no one is asking why his relationship with Leo Hindery suddenly became so problematic and why the Left didn't go to the mattresses for the man who was well positioned --warts and all-- to nationalize American health care.   These things never happen by accident. Someone fed the press and flogged the story. Someone who wanted Daschle to go down hard. And trust me, the Republicans haven't planted a story this good in the DC press in years.   Notice Daschle was sailing towards confirmation until all these details about his links to Leo Hindery came out....beyond just the tax lapses.  

Well, answer this question then. Who in the Democrat Party would be the most motivated to screw Leo Hindery to the wall and take his buddies along with him?

    

Answer: Someone who was on the receiving end of attack ads paid for by Hindery in a prior campaign, perhaps?

  I notice current Obama flack Robert Gibbs was the front man for this corporate hit group; so now a guy who made a living calling Howard Dean a pinko is explaining why Obama is peachy keen closing down Gitmo. And, of course, Gibbs was the prime cheerleader for Daschle's nomination.  (It's a small world, after all

 If Howard Dean and his buddies pulled off this covert op, well, they;ve moved up a notch in my book.   Frankly, I didn't think this white bread WASP had a streak of "Irish Alzheimers"...when a politician gets so old he forgets everything except the grudges. (this disease, BTW ,is why I blog under a pseudonym; too many CT Dems from the 80's and 90's have used my surname as an expletive).

 Even victory doesn't bind up all wounds. The spoils are always worth fighting over.  Watch more battles between the "real Left" and the "corporate Left" akin to the split between the "Official IRA" and the "Provisional IRA".

 

Syndicate content