mortgage meltdown

From tiny ACORNs, mighty hypocrites are born

As you may have read, last night the U.S. Senate voted to defund ACORN in the wake of their "whores R us" scandal.

Many of the 83 Senators who voted "yea" are going now to desperately sweep all their close ties with the troubled activist group into the 'ole memory hole. But one Senator is going to have an especially hard time doing this.

Chris Dodd

Seems the Senator is warmly praised on ACORN's own website!

Sen. Dodd Meets with ACORN to Discuss Foreclosure Prevention

Senator Chris Dodd and Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch with ACORN members March 28. Donna Pearce, on right, worked out a loan modification to save her home through ACORN's housing counseling.

 

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. – U.S. Senator Chris Dodd and Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch met to discuss strategies for fighting foreclosures March 28 at the home of ACORN member Donna Pearce.Pearce thanked the senator for his support of NeighborWorks, which helps provide funding for foreclosure counseling services. She was able to work out a loan modification to save her home from foreclosure by working with ACORN’s housing counselors."I think we're all just a bit jealous of the great work ACORN does," said Finch. He later added, “We should make sure everyone who signs that paperwork to buy a house has ACORN’s number tattooed on their wrist.”Dodd recently unveiled draft legislation, the “HOPE for Homeowners Act of 2008,” that would set up a mortgage refinancing division of the Federal Housing Administration to aid homeowners overwhelmed with unaffordable mortgages. Similar legislation has also been drafted by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank.“This proposal will help provide much-needed relief for people on the brink of foreclosure,” Dodd said. The bill, which extends only to owner-occupied houses, is aimed at “keeping families in their houses and neighborhoods financially stable.”

   Now that Dodd is running behind in his bid for re-election, time to try and make people forget he tried to divert tens of billions of dollars from the TARP bailout to fund ACORN and their allies, even if the taxpayers lost money on TARP . Thankfully, this was headed off, but Dodd got a smaller slush fund tacked on the earlier mortgage relief bill. 

Chris Dodd's various bailouts haven't done much for the overall economy,but's he's made sure they've done plenty for ACORN.

And now, time to cut them loose. Like they haven't been a rogue outfit for years. Please.

Perhaps we ought to add this picture next to the definition. Chris Dodd

 

Dodd's Dicey Dilemma: (Or will screwing up health care make folks forget AIG?)

The passing of Teddy Kennedy has given Chris Dodd a dicey dilemma to deal with.

For months Dodd has been the de facto head of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, sheparding a partisan public option health care bill through the committee in Kennedy's absence.

All the while, Dodd was still supposedly chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, which now, as the bailout era has reached a pause, reverted to the same lassitude it displayed in 2007 and 2008 as the financial system proceeded to meltdown.

Nevermind that financial market reform was supposedly a high point of President Obama's agenda, and that Secretary Geithner recently took to reaming out other bureaucrats for their lack of support of the administration's effort.  The bill has yet to even be scheduled for committee mark-up.

Now, Dodd can do what Washington politicians suggest would be a good career move--abandon the albatross of his failed chairmanship of the Banking Committee and take over for Teddy on the Health Committee--with the avowed goal of passing Obamacare as a trillion dollar tribute to the late Senator.

Amazingly, the clueless Dodd thinks the entire protest movement over socialized medicine will fade away in the good vibes generated by the Teddy funeral.

Yep, this guy really is so haughty he thinks we will meekly agree to whatever the power brokers on Capitol Hill think is really, really good for us.

Some Connecticut Republicans have other ideas. Like Senate candidate Sam Caligiuri      

Sure the lefties are upset but someone has to call out Chris Dodd on this!

Caligiuri is outraged that Dodd would leave the Banking Committee without cleaning up the monumental mess that the chairman has made of the financial economy.

 

Republican U.S. Senate Candidate Sam Caligiuri today started an online petition calling on Senate Majority Leader Reid to force Senator Dodd to do his job at the Banking Committee rather than leaving it to take over the chairmanship of the Health Committee left vacant by the death of Senator Kennedy. Caligiuri issued the following statement:“At the end of my tenure on this committee," Senator Dodd said in early 2007 of his role at Banking, "I want it to be said that the safety and soundness of our financial institutions was not weakened on my watch.” (See the full article here) As of today, it must be said that Chris Dodd failed and the safety and soundness of our financial institutions has been badly weakened over the past two-and-a-half years since Senator Dodd’s comment. Now, at a time when our economy and our financial institutions need oversight and attention to ensure our country is on the road to financial recovery, Chris Dodd has conveniently taken on a new and massive undertaking with the current health care debate – yet he still is grossly negligent in the job he is supposed to do – protecting our financial institutions. It is time for him to actually complete the task assigned to him at the Banking Committee, not to try and pass it along to another senator and sweep his failings under the rug. 

If you think Chris Dodd should clean up the mess he already made, before making a new mess out of the nation's health care system, you can sign this petition here.

We'll how eager Harry Reid is to anger Connecticut voters even further by letting Dodd pull a switch akin to that of Bob Torricelli. 

Chris Dodd thinks he can move on to something more pleasant and leave the nation's damaged economy to someone else to fix. He abandoned the Banking Committee before to run for President. Now he wants to abandon it again so he can pretend to be Teddy Kennedy and improve his fading chances for re-election.

Connecticut voters are a little smarter than that, Chris.  You may try and quit us; but we're ready to fire you.  

 

Chris Dodd :"exonerated" just like a former Heisman trophy winner

Well, Chris Dodd found someone to buy his story that even though he knew he was getting "enhanced customer service" that he did not violate Senate ethics rules on gifts.

The Senate Ethics Committee, chaired by that exemplar of even-handedness Barbara Boxer, declared the Senator had not violated those rules in a ruling Friday.

The Dodd camp argues this is an "exoneration".  Hardly. 

Exoneration occurs when a person who has been convicted of a crime is later proved to have been innocent of that crime

No, what we have here is an "acquittal" . Much as the Bronco owner of Brentwood managed to be tried by a sympathetic jury who applied the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, it appears Dodd's fellow senators were unwilling to pass judgment on Dodd and his buddy Kent Conrad.

The basis for the Committee's conclusion that Dodd did not receive an illegal gift appears to be it concluded the evidence supporting the charge was not credible.  We can presume that the committee determined that Robert Feinberg, the Countrywide whistleblower, was not fully truthful. But unlike a public trial, the reason for their conclusion herein is a mystery.  Certaintly many in the press found Feinberg credible.  One is left to surmise why the Senate ethics committee didn't. 

One way to resolve this would be to release the 18,000 pages of evidence presented in defense of Dodd so voters could reach their own conclusion.The Dodd camp has rejected this transparency out of hand.

Perhaps the real reason Dodd and Conrad skated is it appears the Committee defined "improper gift" as applying only to those gratuities offered exclusively to Senators. The "safety in numbers" defense applied. Since the "Friends of Angelo" program greased cabinet members, bureaucrats, local officials and bankers far and wide, the Committee could say with a somewhat straight face "the same terms were offered to many other borrowers".  Wonderful. If you comp everyone no one gets in trouble.

Many observers have noted that the federal investigation into Countrywide is far from over and the DOJ may be less apt to cut politicians slack than an ethics committee.  The voters may not the Ethics Committee pointedly called out Dodd for poor judgment in creating an appearance of impropriety--noting he ignored "red flags".. Or maybe we can go back to exactly how Dodd bought that Irish cottage.

Then again, perhaps we might solve the mystery of how the Senate Banking Committee was asleep at the switch when the global financial markets collapsed in a heap in 2008. Now that he has the ethics investigation behind him, I'm sure Senator Dodd will work very hard to find the "real killers " of  our economy.     

"Friend of Angelo" Chris Dodd distracted from commandeering health care

Chris Dodd's effort to commandeer the health care system so as to provide a trillion dollar memorial to his BFF Teddy Kennedy hit a little speed bump this afternoon.

Remember Robert Feinberg, Angelo Mozilo's go to guy at Countrywide Mortgage about greasing VIP's

Well, his testimony before the Senate Ethics Committee and a House Committee  got leaked to the AP. And it's not pretty.

Countrywide VIPs, Feinberg told the committees, received discounts on rates, fees and points. Dodd received a break when Countrywide counted both his Connecticut and Washington homes as primary owner-occupied residences -- a fiction, according to Feinberg. Conrad received a type of commercial loan that he was told Countrywide didn't offer.

Hmm, Dodd got the owner-occupied mortgage rates on BOTH the Connecticut house and the DC house even though obviously only one could be a "principal residence".  And who said they didn;t get a "sweetheart deal"? 

Maybe that was the "enhanced customer service" Dodd talks about.  And maybe it's time Dodd post the actual loan documents and loan applications on the Internet. But then again, if both applications said they were for a "principal residence" they the good Senator better hope he didn't mail or fax them.

Dodd spent a million dollars to firm up his party base support and lose ground in the ballot tests in recent weeks. And that was with Countrywide and the Irish Cottage being pretty much in remission.  Now , once again "it's all further proof that Sen. Dodd's candidacy remains toxic."

I haven't seen Rob Simmons's reaction , but Sam Caligiuri was all over this

  Connecticut cannot afford to once again endure the scandals of a leader who has been corrupted by the trappings of power.  If this testimony is true, Senator Dodd's resignation is in order, because he not only did wrong, he covered it up.   

The Republican State Chairman is all over thist too, pointing out this little gem.

Asked by a House investigator if Conrad, the North Dakota senator, "was aware that he was getting preferential treatment?" Feinberg answered: "Yes, he was aware." Referring to Dodd, the investigator asked: "And do you know if during the course of your communications" with the senator or his wife "that you ever had an opportunity to share with them if they were getting special VIP treatment?" "Yes, yes," Feinberg replied.

 Grab the popcorn! One blogger tonight suggested "Nutmeg State Democrats are likely to get even more nervous about Mr. Dodd’s chances in November 2010"

Dropping a dime on Chris Dodd: the website

CallDodd2

The CT Republicans have posted a fun, interactive one stop location for the various Chris Dodd scandals

It's called "Calling Chris Dodd"

Pick up the phone and enjoy!

Real Crisis

President Who Cried Wolf

by Lance Thompson

Over the weekend, the Obama administration has changed the National Economic Threat Level Red (describe economy as a crisis bordering on a catastrophe) to Green “the economy is sound–what, me worry?”  This, despite the fact that during the presidential campaign, Obama ridiculed opponent John McCain for making the same confident statement about America’s finances, and that was long before everyone’s 401K got the Obama meltdown discount.  But, even though our houses and retirement funds are worth less, our jobs are gone or disappearing, and the federal government continues to spend money faster than they can print it, I’m willing to take Obama at his word that the economy is not a crisis.

Now, to address this troubled economy, which is fundamentally strong and not in a crisis, Obama has spent all the money we have and quite a bit of money that doesn’t exist.  He spent this money as directed by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, on all manner of liberal wish-list projects and earmarks, under the guise of “emergency stimulus.”  Okay, let’s assume that all that deficit spending will eventually revive the economy at some point in our grandchildren’s future.

The rest of the world does not stand still, and crises arise on unpredictable and inconvenient schedules all their own.  It is not certain what the next crisis will be, but it is undeniable that there will be one.

In international relations, where state gifts from this administration range from 25 bargain bin DVD’s to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown to Hillary Clinton’s presentation of a panic button to the Russian government, events are unpredictable.  Pakistan may collapse and the nation’s eighty-odd nukes would be in the hands of–well, who knows?  China, with a resurgent space program, has harassed our ships on the high seas and tested anti-satellite weapons.  The Chinese know that there is unlikely to be another American administration less likely to interfere in an invasion of Taiwan.  Russia has ridiculed our groveling offer to cancel missile defense in Eastern Europe in exchange for their cessation of military and nuclear aid to Iran.  And Iran’s dual space- and nuclear programs are transparently complementary as foundations for nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles.  All of these, and many more, are possible international crises.

Naturally, the crisis may be of another kind.  Hurricane season is coming up.  Has anyone noticed a dearth of beachfront housing, commercial property or industry?  We are just as vulnerable to another Katrina as ever.  Volcanoes are restive in Alaska and Yellowstone has been rumbling of late.  California hasn’t had a big quake in over a decade–they’re seismically due, as is the New Madrid fault in the Mississippi Valley which breaks loose at much longer intervals.  We’ve had some near-misses from asteroids lately, the latest of which came as something of an astronomical surprise.  Don’t forget regular disasters like blizzards in the northeast, droughts in the Southwest, floods all over the flatlands.  And judging from the impeccable science that backs up the global warming alarmists, another ice age must be imminent.

Crises come in all varieties.  We could have a viral pandemic that would overtax our health care system.  The drug wars of Mexico, which really are on the scale of an actual war, could explode across the border at any moment.  More terrorist strikes are undeniably being planned.  Many have been prevented or interdicted over the last eight years by a vigilance which has been systematically relaxed since Obama took office.  And, of course, a real financial crisis could occur at any time–the FDIC could fail, homeowners could stop paying their mortgages to qualify for mortgage assistance, mass layoffs could follow tax hikes on businesses and corporations, China and Japan could call in their debts or even stop raising the limits on our credit cards.

I raise these possibilities not merely to increase readers’ gray hair quotients, but because they all have one common trait.  The responses or solutions to each of these crises will be very expensive.  Whether it’s sending a military force to war in the Western Pacific, rebuilding a devastated city or region, or treating millions of stricken Americans, the federal government will be called upon to act quickly, and spend vastly.

But the financial crisis, which has now been disavowed by the administration and Democrats in Congress who used it to pass their profligate spending bills, has already spent all the money.  If what they say is true (try not to snicker at that), then the economy is sound, there is no crises, and we spent a couple of trillion dollars because we panicked.

Much like the response to the boy who cried wolf, the vast economic resources of the nation were called out, record-breaking debt was incurred, and private corporations were taken over by government agencies, all to meet a false alarm.  After two months of Obama, the coffers are empty and the debt is overwhelming.  This administration has made certain that we literally can’t afford another crisis.

Which makes one wonder what we will do when one occurs.

Today's reminder why Chris Dodd is in the process of losing....

This evening's news

Freddie Mac seeks $30.8B in US aid after 4Q loss

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Freddie Mac, facing mounting damage from the U.S. housing crisis, said Wednesday it will ask the government for nearly $31 billion in additional aid after posting a gargantuan loss of more than $50 billion last year.....

The Treasury Department has pledged up to $400 billion in aid for the duo. But as losses mount, many analysts see the companies remaining under government control, perhaps indefinitely. Until officials know the final bill for the housing crisis, it will be tough to figure out whether they can be spun off as private companies, said debt analyst Jim Vogel of FTN Financial in Memphis, Tenn.

Now, this wasn't supposed to happen!

To suggest somehow that [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] are in trouble is simply not accurate,” Dodd replied.

The facts are that Fannie and Freddie are in sound situations,” Dodd said. “They have more that adequate capital, in fact more than the law requires

Why IS this man Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee?

 

U.S. House votes to legalize new form of bank robbery

The U.S. House tonight voted to approve a "mortgage relief" act which now permits a new form of bank robbery.

It's called the "mortgage cramdown".

You see, if the value of the your house has declined in value, now you will be able to file bankruptcy and reduce the principal amount of the debt down to the present, beaten down value.

Then in a few years, when inflation rears its ugly head and the nominal value of homes rises guess what?  The mortgage principal is permanently reduced. And our profligate borrower cashes in on a windfall, while his lender is stuck the removed principal, never to see this money again..

Now, ok , well maybe some poor downtrodden folks deserve some good luck. But, my friends, the U.S. House actually voted to let people who lied on their mortgage application get this relief.  

Writing off mortgage principal to a consenting adult who borrowed more than he should have is simply a bad idea.  It rewards bad behavior. It will only encourage another housing bubble.

I understand the desire to slow the wave of foreclosures and space out the readjustment in the housing markets. And yes, their are honest  folks who can make a go of it. But reduce their interest rates to current market; stretch the loan term; turn the arrearages into a zero interest bullet at maturity. Jeez, there are plenty of fair ways to help a borrower. (not that the servicers for investors like Countrywide try them very often) And that do not cause the borrower to renounce the basic obligation to either pay back the loan or give up the house.

Minnesota's Michelle Bachmann said this bill was   “a tax on all the responsible homeowners. This is the last thing homeowners and our economy need.”   

Let's hope her attitude goes into overdrive in the Senate. We need to find 41 members with non wobbly knees to either fix this bill so it does not reward greedy borrowers or to send the thing back to Barney Frank with a strong message attached.

 

Yet another reminder

Cause

Chris Dodd, March 13, 2007

``I am a strong advocate of subprime lending,'' Dodd said. ``I don't want that word to become a pejorative as junk bonds did.''

Effect

A stunning 48 percent of the nation’s homeowners who have a subprime, adjustable-rate mortgage are behind on their payments or in foreclosure

Why is this guy chairing the Banking Committee, anyway?

 

Move over, Isaac Asimov, Here comes Chris Dodd!!!!!

Chris Dodd, last seen re-enacting Nixon's "limited modified hangout" over his funky mortgage deals, and taking time out of his arduous task of shovelling out trillions of dollars to the banking industry, has decided his true calling is to write what amounts to science fiction. 

 

Crown senior editor Sean Desmond has acquired a history of the congressional bailout of the financial markets by Sen. Christopher J. Dodd with Lary Bloom. Titled Thirteen Days: How the Financial Crisis Changed the Politics of Washington, the book will provide an intimate look at how, over the course of 13 days last September, a financial crisis led to panic and meltdown. Dodd, the chair of the Senate banking committee, will also describe how he and others acted swiftly to try to save the American economy. Crown has world rights via Esther Newberg and  will publish this June.

http://swampland.blogs.time.com:80/2009/02/12/chris-dodd-financial-savior/

Michael Scherer of Time points out that Dodd's saga will no doubt occur in some alternative universe, where I'm sure none of these things happened.

 

This is, of course, the same Chris Dodd who was Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee beginning in 2007, when the banks began their meltdown. He was the one who received the most campaign cash of any senator from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two companies that he defended against increased regulation that might have actually tempered some of the disaster that has followed. He was the one who spent a huge chunk of 2007 not in the Senate, but on the campaign trail, carrying out a lackluster presidential effort funded largely by the banking and insurance industries. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Dodd raised $8.3 million for his presidentical campaign; $4.3 million came from the securities and investments industry. His top contributor was Citibank. His fourth largest contributor was the now-collapsed firm, AIG, a major purveyor of the complex derivitives that helped cause the crisis. He was also the one who in 2007 went before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to praise the "history of solid regulation" in the U.S. capital markets. "Win or lose, [people] invest with a high degree of confidence that American balance sheets are accurate, that investment products like securities and derivatives are properly valued, and that the markets are well-policed against those who would commit negligent, deceptive, or fraudulent acts," he said.

I will briefly add a few other minor points, likeDodd writing toothless regulations on executive compensation into his own TARP bill   Ironically, while Dodd claims to be "infuriated" about private sector bonuses from the financial meltdown, he is happy to collect his own bonus (while a public official no less) writing about the debacle.

You know, maybe this book will be reminscent of Sybil.  You know, the whole split personality business. First Dodd took credit for writing the bailout bill. Then he essentially claimed he "pulled a Plaxico" and wrote a bad bill. Now he's apparently back to saving the world, sans cape.

I dunno Chris, maybe if you had stayed in Washington in 2007 running the Senate Banking Committee instead of moving to Iowa to run for President  , the financial world wouldn't have needed to be saved in the fall of 2008.  Showing up for work; my, what a concept.

I'm sure all of Dodd's angry constituents who have watched the economy implode since their Senator took charge of the Banking Committee will rally to the Senator's side once his side of the story comes out.(Hey, some folks think this guy shouldn't be blamed for the Titanic). Really, this whole thing makes as much sense as Blago negotiating a senate vacancy over his own office phone.

It will be interesting to see if Dodd's book deal gets the same ethical scrutiny as these dubious ventures into publishing. Then again, maybe the proceeds can be appropriated for some socially rewarding endeavors than enriching a politician with three houses; I need to check to see if CT has one of these laws on the books.

Seriously, you think Amazon will list this in their fiction category?  Why wouldn;t they? 

Syndicate content