This ad is aimed not so much at the rural sportsmen community, but for those people who buy firearms for personal protection. Amazingly, Obama voted in the Illinois State Senate to allow towns to bring charges against such people for defensive firearms use, which as usual, does not comport with his tepid support of the Heller v. DC decision.
The Obama-Biden ticket is simply put, against the Second Amendment. Even when it comes to people trying to defend themselvesin their homes from the sort of juvenile psychopaths William Ayres thinks should not be locked up.
Thankfully, we don't have to rely on the DC Republican establishment to bring this message to the voters.
Despite the Obama campaign insisting that the Nov., 2007 Chicago Tribune article was "inartful" description of Obama's position, Obama has a nice long history of supporting the D.C. gun ban, including this video from February, 2008 on ABC 7 in the Washington area:
So, will Heller hurt Obama? Certainly, support for gun control isn't against party platform for him, but after all it's been argued here that drilling is the next gun control -- an issue that tilts largely toward the GOP stance, which Dems would be wise to lay off. Under Obama's banner of progressivism, though, he seems trapped in the 1970s and would be unlikely to move right on gun control, particularly if he's catering to an urban vote.
More importantly, however, the Heller waffling introduces yet another instance of Obama taking a key issue and attempting to change positions dramatically by means of vagueness. Look at the video, Obama tries to overcome a prior gaffe by giving a run at having it both ways and ultimately failing. It's rather difficult to "respect the second amendment and people's traditions" while taking away the guns. Can this be exploited as another instance of his dramatically changing stances, or at the very least, attempting to equivocate on something? In some ways, the "present" votes have not played enough of a role in the narrative yet; on the other hand, the right to bear arms could be the issue that helps mobilize veterans for McCain, if it's played well.
The conventional punditry on McCain's call to end the ban on offshore oil exploration has focused on whether President Bush's suppport for the idea will hurt McCain in the fall. But that could change, and soon, if what's happened in just the past few days develops into a real trend:
Sen. Jim Webb announced he now supports exploration off the coast of Virginia.
Ex-Gov. Mark Warner also supports opening up the Virginia coastline to possible drilling.
Meanwhile, the latest Gallup survey shows Democrats are split on offshore drilling, with 39% in support while 59% still oppose.
Better yet, it's an issue where independents side with the GOP, although the margins are not so wide (80% in favor vs. 56%). Overall, Americans favor opening up U.S. coastal waters by a 57% to 41%.
Now, what does this issue remind you of? How about gun control in the late 1990s?