| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Let's Recap Palin's "Outrage" And Letterman's Apologies
David Letterman was hardly alone in making jokes about Bristol Palin’s pregnancy. But it turns out there have been some by other comedians about her younger daughter. All of these jokes are in poor taste. Jokes about Bristol Palin, and even the other Palin children, are common place as is demonstrated here:
Top 10 Reasons Sarah Palin’s “Outrage” is Misplaced and A Little Late…
10) Last September, a skit on Saturday Night Live suggested incest in the Palin family. “What about the husband?” asked a mock Times reporter. “You know he’s doing those daughters. I mean, come on. It’s Alaska!” No outrage. Sarah Palin appeared on the show one month later in late October.
9) Days after the announcement of Bristol’s pregnancy, Conan O’Brien joked, “It’s true, John McCain’s running mate, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, has revealed that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant. Palin said, ‘We should never have introduced her to John Edwards.’” Where was the outrage? Was Conan promoting infidelity with an underage girl?
8 ) From two different Tonight Shows: “Governor Palin announced over the weekend that her 17-year-old unmarried daughter is five months pregnant. Oh, boy, you thought John Edwards was in trouble before, now he’s really done it!” AND…”All the Republicans are heaping praise on Governor Palin. Fred Thompson said, as an actor, he could see them making a movie about Sarah Palin and her family. Didn’t they already make that movie? I think it was called ‘Knocked Up!’”–Jay Leno
7) Craig Ferguson’s skit of “Larry King vs Levi Johnston” asks about “kinky sex” with the drapes open. Craig Ferguson’s honorary Alaska citizenship, granted by Governor Palin wasn’t rescinded.
6) “According to expense reports, Sarah Palin charged the state of Alaska over $21,000 for her children to travel with her on official business. In fairness to Gov. Palin, when she leaves them home alone they get pregnant.” –Seth Meyers (SNL). Sarah Palin was in a sketch with Meyers a week earlier.
5) On October 8, 2008, Sarah Palin walked out on the ice with six year old Piper and 13 year old Willow, before the game, Conan O’Brien said, “Saturday night, Sarah Palin is going to drop the first puck at the Philadelphia Flyers’ hockey game. Then Palin will spend the rest of the game trying to keep the hockey players out of her daughter’s penalty box.” Oh, yes he did. You get the outrage…but not a peep then. According to the new “logic”, O’Brien was advocating for some really sick stuff.
4) Rush Limbaugh: “Everyone knows the Clintons have a cat. Socks is the White House cat. But did you know there is a White House dog?” Limbaugh put up a picture of Chelsea Clinton. At the time, Chelsea Clinton was 13 years old. Rush also said, “In last year’s campaign, the most prominent, articulate voice for standard run-of-the-mill good old-fashioned American conservatism was Sarah Palin.” Calling a young teenager a “dog” can’t be helpful to her “self-esteem.” Where is the apology from the leader of the GOP?
3) “Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno.”–John McCain, Sarah Palin’s running mate. Should McCain apologize to every young woman in America?
2) Palin’s friend, political defender and informer of the David Letterman comments, John Ziegler, was fired from his radio show for using the “n-word” online and on air in 1997. In 2000, he was fired for spelling the “n-word” on the air. How much does that word affect the psychological health of America’s youth, regardless of their race? Now he is pimping his film about how mean the “liberal media” was to Sarah Palin.
AND…The NUMBER 1 REASON Sarah Palin’s Outrage is Misplaced and A Little Late…
1) The “candidate who must be obeyed” was talking about Palin’s family when he said, “Kids are off limits.” Jake Tapper of ABC News interviewed then Candidate Obama, and asked, “Governor Palin and her husband issued a statement today saying their 17-year-old daughter Bristol, who is unmarried, is five months pregnant. Do you have any reaction?”
OBAMA: “I have said before and I will repeat again, I think people’s families are off-limits. And people’s children are especially off-limits. This shouldn’t be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Governor Palin’s performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. And so I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know, my mother had me when she was 18. And, you know, how family deals with issues and — and, you know, teenaged children, that shouldn’t be the topic of — of our politics.”
The Palin children have been fodder for comedians since they were brought to the national stage. Incest isn’t funny. Ugly kid jokes aren’t funny. Many of the things said about public figures are just flat wrong. Being “knocked up” isn’t much fun. Racist comments hurt all of us. I exhausted the top 10 list before I ran out of outrageous instances ignored by the Palins.
The National Organization for Women named David Letterman to their Hall of Shame. Will Letterman be joining Jay Leno? Conan O’Brien? Craig Ferguson? Seth Myers? Rush Limbaugh? Or John McCain? Of course not! I guess N.O.W. didn’t bother checking Sarah Palin’s “feminist” credentials. All across America, right wing radio and television talk show hosts feigned outrage in perfect synchronicity. The same people who back up Palin’s high drama assertions against Letterman ignored the connections between Bill O’Reilly’s irresponsible incitement and the murder of Dr. George Tiller. David Letterman, a late night entertainer, apologized. Fox New’s Bill O’Reilly has not.
As a parent, I understand being defensive. I just wonder what took so long. Why now?
Why now? The answer is simple. The right wing “outrage” has nothing to do with feminism and certainly nothing to do with jokes about Palin’s children. The right wing blogs were attacking Letterman over a Sarah Palin joke after Monday’s show before they realized they could attract more attention by falsely claiming Letterman was joking about Palin’s minor daughter as opposed to Bristol Palin. While Letterman’s joke was clearly about Bristol, other jokes above were not. While Letterman’s latest joke was about Bristol Palin after turning 18, and after she has been appearing in public speaking about her pregnancy, it is also notable that the above jokes were at the time about Palin’s 17-year-old daughter.
While the jokes were in poor taste,as even Letterman admitted last week, they hardly deserved the attention they received--unless the attackers have other motives for their attacks. This controversy is just another in a long string of examples of how the authoritarian wing of the right opposes freedom of speech and desires to silence anyone who disagrees with their reactionary agenda, and lying about what others have said is a frequent tactic which they employ.
Today, David Letterman has gone out of his way to attempt to diffuse the controversy by apologizing for jokes of his which were distorted by right wing attackers. The Los Angeles Times reports:
Under fire for a risque joke last week, David Letterman has apologized to Gov. Sarah Palin and her supporters. But a group urging CBS to fire the host says it’s still not enough.
On CBS’ “Late Show” tonight, Letterman says he’s sorry about a monologue earlier this month in which he joked that New York Yankees star Alex Rodriguez impregnated Palin’s daughter during a game. Letterman has said he intended the joke to be in reference to Palin’s 18-year-old daughter Bristol, but Gov. Palin actually attended the game with her 14-year-old daughter Willow. Some critics have accused Letterman of joking about statutory rape.
“I told a bad joke,” Letterman told viewers at an afternoon taping. “I told a joke that was beyond flawed, and my intent is completely meaningless compared to the perception. And since it was a joke I told, I feel that I need to do the right thing here and apologize for having told that joke. It’s not your fault that it was misunderstood, it’s my fault.”
He concluded, “I’m sorry about it and I’ll try to do better in the future.”
The New York Times adds further information (but is off by a week--it only feels like it was well more than a week ago):
David Letterman directly apologized to Gov. Sarah Palin and her daughters on his program Monday night, saying he took responsibility for a joke that had offended Ms. Palin, her family, and her supporters.
Mr. Letterman opened the desk portion of his show with the apology in which he said he wanted to say he was sorry to “to the two daughters involved, Bristol and Willow, and also to the governor and her family and everybody else who was outraged by the joke.” Two weeks ago on his “Late Show” program on CBS, he had joked about Governor Palin attending a Yankee game with her daughter.
The joke, in which Mr. Letterman seemingly confused Willow, who is 14 and attended a Yankee game with Gov. Palin that week, with Bristol, who is 18 and an unwed mother, had to do with the Yankee slugger Alex Rodriguez impregnating Ms. Palin’s daughter.
Last week Mr. Letterman somewhat defiantly said that there was a misperception going on and he would never make a sexually charged joke about a 14-year old. But he never expressly explained that he had inadvertently confused the two Palin daughters.
Monday he acknowledged that as the host of the program it was his responsibility to get the joke right. “I told a joke that was beyond flawed, and my intent is completely meaningless compared to the perception.”
He also insisted he was confused about the daughters. “I was told at the time she was there with Rudy Guiliani,” Mr. Letterman said. “I should have made the joke about Rudy.”
It is doubtful that this apology will make any difference with the Palin supporters who continued to smear Letterman after his first apology last week. These attacks really have nothing to do with jokes about Palin’s daughters. Right wing bloggers began attacking Letterman for telling jokes about Sarah Palin after last Monday’s show and it wasn’t until later that they began distributing the fabrications that Letterman had told a joke about Willow Palin. Right wing supporters of Sarah Palin have been organizing to attack David Letterman for quite a while; last January Alaska Dispatch repoted that TeamSarah.org was trying to shut down this source of criticism (which John McCain would have liked to be silenced during the campiagn) while sending out this message:
Over 500 Team Sarah members protested to the FCC about Letterman’s unsavory comment about Gov. Palin. They are hearing from the FCC that it is launching an investigation!
PS. TV Week has the full transcript of Letterman's apology:
“All right, here – I’ve been thinking about this situation with Governor Palin and her family now for about a week – it was a week ago tonight, and maybe you know about it, maybe you don’t know about it. But there was a joke that I told, and I thought I was telling it about the older daughter being at Yankee Stadium. And it was kind of a coarse joke. There’s no getting around it, but I never thought it was anybody other than the older daughter, and before the show, I checked to make sure in fact that she is of legal age, 18. Yeah. But the joke really, in and of itself, can’t be defended. The next day, people are outraged. They’re angry at me because they said, ‘How could you make a lousy joke like that about the 14-year-old girl who was at the ball game?’ And I had, honestly, no idea that the 14-year-old girl, I had no idea that anybody was at the ball game except the Governor and I was told at the time she was there with Rudy Giuliani…And I really should have made the joke about Rudy…” (audience applauds) “But I didn’t, and now people are getting angry and they’re saying, ‘Well, how can you say something like that about a 14-year-old girl, and does that make you feel good to make those horrible jokes about a kid who’s completely innocent, minding her own business,’ and, turns out, she was at the ball game. I had no idea she was there. So she’s now at the ball game and people think that I made the joke about her. And, but still, I’m wondering, ‘Well, what can I do to help people understand that I would never make a joke like this?’ I’ve never made jokes like this as long as we’ve been on the air, 30 long years, and you can’t really be doing jokes like that. And I understand, of course, why people are upset. I would be upset myself.
“And then I was watching the Jim Lehrer ‘Newshour’ – this commentator, the columnist Mark Shields, was talking about how I had made this indefensible joke about the 14-year-old girl, and I thought, ‘Oh, boy, now I’m beginning to understand what the problem is here. It’s the perception rather than the intent.’ It doesn’t make any difference what my intent was, it’s the perception. And, as they say about jokes, if you have to explain the joke, it’s not a very good joke. And I’m certainly – ” (audience applause) “- thank you. Well, my responsibility – I take full blame for that. I told a bad joke. I told a joke that was beyond flawed, and my intent is completely meaningless compared to the perception. And since it was a joke I told, I feel that I need to do the right thing here and apologize for having told that joke. It’s not your fault that it was misunderstood, it’s my fault. That it was misunderstood.” (audience applauds) “Thank you. So I would like to apologize, especially to the two daughters involved, Bristol and Willow, and also to the Governor and her family and everybody else who was outraged by the joke. I’m sorry about it and I’ll try to do better in the future. Thank you very much.” (audience applause)
Anyone ever hear an apology such as this from people such as Rush Limbaugh, who has knowingly told jokes about children of Democrats who are under 18?
Palin supporters say they are continuing with their planned anti-Letterman protest outside of the Ed Sullivan Theater in NYC tomorrow evening.
- Cape Republican Charger's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
How Obama Got Elected
In my own opinion making jokes are not those pleasing, especially if you know it will affects another personal life. I just don’t understand why some people do some lame jokes and at the end they will feel apologetic and begged for forgiveness. The lesson here is ”MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS!” Anyway, in relation to Sarah Palin, A lot of people want to know How Obama Got Elected. How Obama Got Elected is also the title of a documentary by John Ziegler, whose film purports that he was elected because the mainstream media was mean to Sarah Palin. It has been suggested that Obama was elected was via a process called voting – which has not occurred to Mr. Ziegler, who isn’t famed for intellectual prowess – and on a recent interview with Contessa Brewer on MSNBC, his microphone was cut due to his refusal to not act like an idiot. Many would give big cash advances to make How Obama Got Elected to go away and Ziegler to shut up.
At some point in time people
At some point in time people have to stop apologizing to Republicans. They are part of the problem and are now attacking Barack Obama and doing everything they can to prevent him from repairing the damage. There was no misperception of the joke that David Letterman told. The Republicans knew full well that the joke was not about the younger Palin daughter. They saw an opportunity to pounce and they pounced and the really sad thing about it is that America is letting them get away with it. Again. I am extremely disappointed in Letterman for caving like this, though I am sure he is only following orders from his bosses at CBS. (The same people who caved when that truthful report about Bush Jr. being AWOL from the TANG was aired.) At some point somebody in this country is going to have to stand up to these shams and say enough is enough. I am not holding my breath.
Letterman said more than was
Letterman said more than was needed in apologizing but it is understandable why he did. For those of us who have watched the right wing in action there is no doubt that this was an intentional distortion. It is fine for us to talk about this on blogs, but I wouldn’t expect Letterman to get into this on his show. By apologizing, along with again pointing out that his joke was not about Bristol, he takes the high road and Republicans will continue to look petty when they continue to attack.
The general public might not know everything the far right is up to, but they have figured out enough to reject the Republicans and vote them out of office since they were taken over by the extreme right wing.
The reports claim he was not under orders to do this from CBS, but who knows for sure. I certainly lost a lot of respect for CBS with the way they handled the Dan Rather matter. There is a difference here. While Rather was 90% right in his story, he shouldn’t have used the questionable memo. As a news anchor, there is a higher standard for Dan Rather than for David Letterman. While I think it was unfair to throw away Rather’s entire career for being conned by one memo, it makes more sense to have a higher standard of accuracy for a news report than for the “facts” in one of Letterman’s jokes.
I also wonder if CBS panicked with regards to Dan Rather, but after going through that, better understands right wing smear campaigns and will be less likely to fall for that again.
(I should add that while the memos were probably faked, this is still being battled by Rather, who claims they were legitimate. While they appear questionable, rare type writers have been found which could have typed those memos).
While Rather was 90% right in
Yes, I agree: to zoom in on the meno and forget Rather’s larger career isn’t fair. And I suspect Rather had a falling out with the producers of CBS over this, so the ending of his CBS career was partly his choice, right or wrong.
On the other hand, it was pretty serious mistake. We have to trust that Rather, entitled to his opinions and feelings, can keep them out of his job, and that incident made him look bias on the job. Suddenly everything he might say about GWB is suspect and tainted, whether it really is or not.
It was only Rather’s prestige and history that kept him being summarily fired. Show business and network TV is one the toughest most competitive business to be in. People not in the business have no real idea about how tough it is. Producers have absolutely zero tolerance for these types of mistakes and screw ups.
Another good example is
Another good example is Isaiah Washington who was fired from Grey’s Anatomy. A small indiscristioin to most of us, but to producers, agents, and sponsers, it’s a big deal. And for very good reasons -- the business is just far too tough, the bottom line is very VERY difficult to meet, so no one in their right minds is going to put up with that type of behavior. That’s the business. Outsiders don’t get this. Insiders, if they don’t know it, learn it the hard Hard way.
I am extremely disappointed
Yes, that’s exactly right. It’s show business with an empathises on “business.” DL made a mistake. He didn’t know it at the time, but in the end, it was a mistake.
There’s many ways to voice your opinion and many ways to do it, but if you’re on the job doing it and you manage to offend a lot of people who are your potential customers, you’re going to get hauled onto the carpet. It’s not political -- it’s business, and DL simply was not doing his job that night.
If you’re referring to Memogate (CBS-60 minutes TANG), that was another stupidity on the part of anti-Bush people, i.e., four documents were presented as authentic in a 60 Minutes Wednesday broadcast aired by CBS on September 8, 2004, less than two months before the 2004 Presidential Election, but it was later found that CBS had failed to authenticate the documents. Subsequently, several typewriter and typography experts concluded the documents are forgeries, as have some media sources. When GWB was president, I too was anti-Bush, but CBS had every cause to haul Rather onto the carpet.
Wrong -- “we’re” not letting anyone get away with anything.
Look -- here’s the rules: be honest, be accurate, and don’t get personal. In short -- do your job. That’s what it means be professional in DL’s and Rather’s line of work. Seriously screw up on any one of those, and you’re in trouble -- guaranteed.
it wasn't rather's job to factcheck.
canning him was a headhunt, nothing more.
Palin supporters say they are
If DL told a similar type of joke about the Obama’s, the exact same thing would be happening, except from the “left.” It’s human nature, esp. when DL was in the wrong. It’s why producers and sponsors hate this sort of behavior from those who represent a show or product -- it hurts the show and the product. They have too many daily headaches as it is. They don’t need it. It’s that simple.
Ah, DL gets it: the columnist
Ah, DL gets it:
Cape Republican, you’re exactly right the “Right-wing” has been conducting a smear campaign, i.e., accusing DL of doing way Way more than what he really did . . . but it doesn’t matter.
The producers and sponsers, I’m sure, are symapthic in regards to the over-reaction of some on the right, but, in the end, they don’t care. They can’t care, if they want to stay in business. It draws fire they don’t need or want and they count on DL to NOT draw that kind of negative attention.
In the end, I think DL has handled himself very well -- he’s been accountable, he’s admitted the jokes should not been aired, and I think he really is sorry. And the producers and sponsers, I’m sure, have been telling DL this controvery has got to be put to bed and left behind ASAP. DL is doing everything he can to make this happen, and it’s not a mistake he’ll be making again.
There are several anti-David
There are several anti-David Letterman groups on social networking sites. Some are Scary. All of this smacks of the McCarthy era. But back then CBS had courage and a sense of what’s fair when they stood behind Ed Murrow as he brought that despicable man to his knees. Obviously they have lost their spine.
Obviously they have lost
They haven’t. There’s been about a million jokes made about Palin, and there’s been no controversy. DL’s jokes crossed a line in every one’s mind, include DL himself. Far FAR more people were offended than anyone ever realized. It happens.’
Like you and me, the producers and sponsor like having a good nights sleep, and stuff like this keeps them up, and then they wake up cranky. They don’t need it and neither does anyone who works for them, including DL.
Producers and sponsors HATE this stuff. They’re not mad at a spurious, facebook hate group. They’re mad at DL for doing something to attract this kind of negative attention. Even DL knows this. That’s why he’s bending over backwards to try to put this behind him. Network TV is the toughest businesses in the world. People get fired all the time. If it gets bad enough, they wont’ hesitate to throw DL under the bus. The network knows it and DL knows it. While it’s extremely unlike it’ll get that bad, this is the truth of it. They want and need DL to make this go away. That’s what he’s doing.
Re. Strider
Strider,
Letterman’s jokes didn’t cross any line. If you look at the selection of jokes quoted in the top of the post on the topic, Letterman has not done anything different. The difference here is that he’s a target of the right wing and they managed to spread a story that Letterman told a joke which was different from what he actually said. It even turns out that others have told jokes about the younger daughters, which Letterman did not do. That doesn’t excuse it--all are to some degree in the wrong--but it shows it makes no sense to solely be attacking Letterman unless those attacking have other motives. They have also made it clear even before this that the intent was to go after Letterman. This has absolutely nothing to so with what Letterman actually said.
Re. Leslie G./ Ed Murrow
Leslie,
I’m glad you brought up Murrow. That is a far better comparison than Rather. While I dislike how CBS handled this, Rather probably did make a mistake. (I’ll allow him his day in court before definitely saying the memos were faked, but the burden of proof is now on him.)
Standing up for Murrow is a far better comparison, especially considering the similarities between the McCarthyites and the current right wingers who are waging a jihad against Letterman.
Hmm...
When a baseball pitcher throws a pitch that ends up hitting a player, among other things, a pitcher’s reputation is a factor. As a pitcher of jokes, what is Letterman’s reputation about crossing the line with kids? I don’t believe he has ever been accused of such in a very long career. Another factor is a pitcher’s reaction afterwards, when does one who intended to bean a player ever go to immediately apologize? IMO Letterman has nothing else to apologize for, there was no intent for the joke to be “outside the strike zone” and if it was, he has already apologized and to nag or attack him any more is uncalled for. I have less sympathy for an “Imus” who is always either “painting the corner” or going outside with his pitchs.
The bottom line here is that
The bottom line here is that Willow Palin would have never been involved in this if the right wing bloggers and then Sarah Palin hadn’t dragged her name into it. Sarah Palin made a big mistake if she cares at all about her daughters.
While David Letterman never mentioned Willow Palin in his jokes, spreading a message such as this is the result of the right wing dragging Willow’s name into this with their false claims that the joke was about Willow.
Nawh, the real bottom line here isn't Willow...
it's still DandyDave -that mean-spirited, snarky, still-bitter-over-not-getting-Carson's-seat, posterboi for the oh-so-hip, very liberal, Obama-worshipping late night viewer.
The bottom line is that, for once, DandyDave's loudmouth, snarky comments got attention beyond his usual audience of beer-soaked, Barco-lounging, lonely liberal males thrice divorced and back living in Momma's basement.
I know, usually DandyDave's crowd (some represented here in these comments) are the kind of losers who still can quote MontyPython skits and think the last election proves "their peeps" are now in ascendancy in America (can anything be so lame as a 40-something liberal losers using rap slang and hairplugs to prove they're still youthful?).
But that's DandyDave and his listeners.
The people who listen to DandyDave and tolerate his usual bigotry and snarkiness are the same liberal losers who thought Don Imus's "joke" about some "nappy headed ho's" was "just misconstrued". Hence the "perception versus intent" twisted logic of DandyDave.
Context is everything. Did DandyDave really, sincerely apologize? Nope, I doubt it -even in this lastest version of DandyDave doing a mea culpa.
He didn't mean to apologize the first time --snark and snide little smiled included. He didn't meant to apologize the second time, either. In his heart, he knows his joke was on-target, if somewhat flawed. His mistake was thinking that it wouldn't get beyond the Barco-lounger, beer soaked liberal losers who usually watch his slop-as-entertainment.
DandyDave needs to suffer a lot more before he's allowed off the hot seat.
I hope the pressure keeps on mounting and CBS lawyers yank his chain a few degrees closer to choke.
You prove the lie.
This wasn't about the comment, but about Letterman's liberalness. This was a fake controversy to attack Letterman. Nearly everyone agrees as much, even you.
Sure it was, blue eyes... but you keep wearing those
attractive tin foil hats... they're helping you divert attention from the true face of liberal losers with Hollywood values trashing Palin.
DandyDave was acting the part he's assumed in the last 5-9 yrs as one of the more harsh LiberalWhackJob critics of all things American, Bush, conservative or middle class. He's a posterboi for guys like you who are flat-out liberal losers whining into the Barco-lounger pillow at 1 AM.
The reason why all his fellow liberal losers are coming to bat for him --like the fag hag Joy Behar or the ultimate black bitchiness and thrice married Whoops Goldberg-- is because he's one of them... a liberal loser comedian who crossed a big-assed line and, despite being advised by Obama-the-Messiah not to do it, they go ahead blithely and commit 1 AM political incorrectness.
You'd like it to be about something else. But Willow isn't the bottom line. The bottom line is that Dandy Dave's ass is in the sling for a good reaming and all fellow liberal losers like you fear being put in the sling when you do it and... this is the instructive part... get caught.
Because we all know, around any watercooler near a Hollywood values, liberal loser "artist" or "comedian" you'll hear far, far worse jokes about underaged females.
It's part of your culture. It's why many of you are three, four, five times married liberal losers rocking in your beer-stained Barco-loungers at 1 AM whooping it up when DandyDave acts just like you.
Like I said, I hope DandyDave burns for a few weeks --and so does NancyPelosi, who must be sighing that some other idiot liberal has helped her out of the penalty box. I hope his time in the sling will reinforce his need to plug that yap of his. And I hope CBS loses some sponsors. And the CBS brass make DandyDave sweat through his current negotiations for the upcoming 3 yr contract extension.
Nothing could be finer for that morally reprehensible piece of comedian sh*t. Now, I wonder when JonStewart's going to get his time in the sling?
I remember when Limbaugh was
I remember when Limbaugh was kicked off of ESPN because he said the only reason that anyone makes a big deal about Donovan McNabb; is not that he is a great quarterback. It is because he is black. HAHAHA! He still says that type of stuff everyday!
You figured us out, Cape.
This was all just a pretext to get Letterman. Unlike Conan/SNL/Leno, Letterman didn’t agree with our reactionary agenda. So he had to go.
Tool.